Re: [petsc-users] consider an error message as a petscinfo??

Thanks a lot for your explanation, Barry, This makes sense! Fande, On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Barry Smith wrote: > > Fande, > > Yes. Say one is doing a timestepping and using a direct solver. With > time stepping we do not want to necessarily stop (in fact we

Re: [petsc-users] consider an error message as a petscinfo??

Fande, Yes. Say one is doing a timestepping and using a direct solver. With time stepping we do not want to necessarily stop (in fact we almost never) on a failed solve (due to for example a failed factorization). We want the code to continue up the stack until it gets to the time

[petsc-users] consider an error message as a petscinfo??

Hi All, In MatSolve(), there is a piece of code: * if (mat->errortype) {ierr = PetscInfo1(mat,"MatFactorError %D\n",mat->errortype);CHKERRQ(ierr);ierr = VecSetInf(x);CHKERRQ(ierr); } else {ierr = (*mat->ops->solve)(mat,b,x);CHKERRQ(ierr); }* If a direct solver such as LU or