On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:46 AM Yann Jobic wrote:
> I think i may have misunderstood this discussion :
>
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/htdig/petsc-users/2017-October/033620.html
>
That discussion is about the dimensionality of the problem rather than the
number of dofs at a point.
Regular
I think i may have misunderstood this discussion :
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/htdig/petsc-users/2017-October/033620.html
best regards,
Yann
Le 05/12/2019 à 17:23, Jed Brown a écrit :
I don't understand the question. There has never been a limit to the
number of dofs per grid point. Was
I don't understand the question. There has never been a limit to the
number of dofs per grid point. Was the email thread referring to
spatial dimension?
Yann Jobic writes:
> Hello,
> I read in the email archive (from 2016) that, at that time, the number
> of synchronized dof (in MPI/ghost
Hmm, for DMDA and DMStag is should not have a limit (certain ranges of
values are better optimized than others but more optimizations may be done).
For DMPLEX in theory again it should be what ever you like (again larger
values may require more optimization in our code to get really
Hello,
I read in the email archive (from 2016) that, at that time, the number
of synchronized dof (in MPI/ghost cells sense) is 3 or 4.
Is that still the case ? I would like to use PETSc for solving the
Boltzmann equation (via Discreet velocity method, which means a lot of
dof per node).
Is
