> El 7 jun 2017, a las 16:41, Kannan, Ramakrishnan escribió:
>
> Jose,
>
> I am running in the super computer environment. I just do a “module load
> cray-petsc-64/3.7.4.0”. I don’t compile PETSc.
> --
> Regards,
> Ramki
In
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Kannan, Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Barry,
>
> Thanks for the kind response. I am building slepc 3.7.3 and when I
> configure –with-64-bit-indices=1, I am getting the following error.
>
> ./configure --with-64-bit-indices=1 --prefix=/lustre/atlas/proj-
This option belongs to PETSc's configure, not SLEPc's configure.
Jose
> El 7 jun 2017, a las 16:37, Kannan, Ramakrishnan escribió:
>
> Barry,
>
> Thanks for the kind response. I am building slepc 3.7.3 and when I configure
> –with-64-bit-indices=1, I am getting the following
Jose,
I am running in the super computer environment. I just do a “module load
cray-petsc-64/3.7.4.0”. I don’t compile PETSc.
--
Regards,
Ramki
On 6/7/17, 10:41 AM, "Jose E. Roman" wrote:
This option belongs to PETSc's configure, not SLEPc's configure.
Jose
Barry,
Thanks for the kind response. I am building slepc 3.7.3 and when I configure
–with-64-bit-indices=1, I am getting the following error.
./configure --with-64-bit-indices=1
--prefix=/lustre/atlas/proj-shared/csc209/ramki/slepc
ERROR: Invalid arguments --with-64-bit-indices=1
Use -h for
The resulting matrix has something like
>>> 11808*11808*1.e-6
14,399,953,920.036863
nonzero entries. It is possible that some integer operations are overflowing
since C int can only go up to about 4 billion before overflowing.
You can building with a different PETSC_ARCH value
> El 5 jun 2017, a las 19:37, Kannan, Ramakrishnan escribió:
>
> I am running EPS for NHEP on a matrix of size 11808x11808 and I am
> experiencing the attached trapped. This is a 1D row distributed sparse
> uniform random matrix with 1e-6 sparsity over 36