Thanks, Blaise and Matt,
I possibly mess up the brew installation somehow. I will clean up
everything and start over, and report back.
Fande,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>Matt
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Blaise A Bourdin
Hi All,
In MatSolve(), there is a piece of code:
* if (mat->errortype) {ierr = PetscInfo1(mat,"MatFactorError
%D\n",mat->errortype);CHKERRQ(ierr);ierr = VecSetInf(x);CHKERRQ(ierr);
} else {ierr = (*mat->ops->solve)(mat,b,x);CHKERRQ(ierr); }*
If a direct solver such as LU or
these
> "exceptional cases" directly.
>
>Note that you can use options like -snes_error_if_not_converged or
> -ksp_error_if_not_converged to force the error to be set as soon as any
> problem with convergence or zero factorization is found (good for
> debugging, but not usually for production
Hi ALL,
I am solving a generalized eigenvalue problem Ax=\lambda Bx. I want to
retrieve matrices A and B from EPS, but got the following errors:
[0]PETSC ERROR: No support for this operation for this object type
[0]PETSC ERROR: Cannot retrieve original matrices (have been modified)
[0]PETSC
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Anton Popov wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > are there any news about fixing buggy behavior of SuperLU_DIST, exactly
> what
> > is described here:
> >
> >
Any references on this topic except the users manual? I am interested in
mathematics theory on this topic.
Fande Kong,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> 丁老师 writes:
>
> > Dear friends:
> > In the projection method for the solution
e, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Developers,
>>
>> Any reason to force users provide a matrix which does not miss any
>> diagonal entries when using a LU-type solver?
>>
>> Sometime, it is impossible to have a
Hi Developers,
Any reason to force users provide a matrix which does not miss any diagonal
entries when using a LU-type solver?
Sometime, it is impossible to have all diagonal entries in a matrix, that
is, the matrix has to miss some diagonal entries. For example, there is a
saddle-point matrix
Hi,
For mechanics problems, the contact surface changes during each nonlinear
iteration. Therefore, the sparsity of matrix also changes during each
nonlinear iteration. We know the preallocaiton is important for performance.
My question is: it is possible to re-allocate memory during each
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>Thanks Satish,
>
> I have fixed this in barry/fix-matmpixxxsetpreallocation-reentrant
> (in next for testing)
>
> Fande,
>
> This will also make MatMPIAIJSetPreallocation() work properly with
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>Thanks Satish,
>>
>> I have fixed this in barry/fix-matmpixxxsetpreallocation-re
If you are using the matrix-free method, the number of function
evaluations is way more than the number of Newton iterations.
Fande,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Justin Chang wrote:
> Sorry forgot to hit reply all
>
> On Monday, October 24, 2016, Justin Chang
Using -snes_linesearch_type basic to turn off the line search, you
will see that the number of function evaluations is the same as the number
of Newton iterations.
Fande,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Gideon Simpson
wrote:
> I just mean that if I were working
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Jeremy Theler writes:
>
> > Hi again
> >
> > I have been wokring on these issues. Long story short: it is about the
> > ordering of the unknown fields in the vector.
> >
> > Long story:
> > The physics
Barry, Thanks so much for your explanation. It helps me a lot.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 10, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I know how to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 11, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Barry, Thanks so much for your explanation. It helps me a lot.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 201
> resulting file called binaryoutput.
>
>I need a test matrix to update the PETSc code for this case.
>
>
> Barry
>
> > On Oct 11, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:18 PM,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov>
> wro
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Barry Smith writes:
> > I would make that a separate routine that the users would call first.
>
> We have VecMDot and VecMAXPY. I would propose adding
>
> VecQR(PetscInt nvecs,Vec *vecs,PetscScalar
olutions to this issue?
Fande Kong,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Jed Brown <j.
diagonal scaling we cannot apply the inverse of the
> preconditioner to a vector and thus cannot compute the nullspace(AB).
> --
>
> Any feed back on the correctness or clarity of the material is
> appreciated. The punch line is that right preconditioning cannot be trusted
to contribute something like this latter (of
course, if you are ok with this algorithm), when we are moving to
nonlinear problems in our applications.
Fande Kong,
>
> Barry
>
>
> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
Hi All,
I think we have been discussing this topic for a while in other threads.
But I still did not get yet. PETSc uses 'SamePattern' as the default
FactPattern. Some test cases in MOOSE fail with this default option, but I
can make these tests pass if I set the FactPattern as
Thanks a lot Satish!
Like Jed said, it would be better if we could come up an algorithm for
automatically computing a hash size for a given n. Otherwise, we may need
to add more entries to the lookup again in the future.
Fande,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Satish Balay
BTW, one more question:
There are some pieces of code in #if defined(PETSC_USE_CTABLE) #endif.
How to disable ctable? That is, make PETSC_USE_CTABLE false during
configuration.
Fande,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Satish Balay
Hi All,
Hash size is set manually according to the number of expected keys in the
function PetscTableCreateHashSize(). Any reason to restrict the
``n"<3276800?
One user here encountered an issue because of this restriction. The
messages are as follows:
[3]PETSC ERROR: -
>else SETERRQ1(PETSC_COMM_SELF,PETSC_ERR_ARG_OUTOFRANGE,"A really huge
> hash is being requested.. cannot process: %D",sz);
>PetscFunctionReturn(0);
> }
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Hash size is set manually
, and it is from a grain-tracking thing.
Distance 1 did magic work. We have 8 colors now using JP, power,..
Thanks.
Fande,
>
>
> > On Mar 23, 2017, at 4:57 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Hong,
> >
> > I did some tests with a matri
Thanks, Hong,
I did some tests with a matrix (40x40):
*row 0: (0, 1.) (2, 1.) (3, 1.) (11, 1.) (14, 1.) (15, 1.) (19, 1.)
(22, 1.) (23, 1.) (24, 1.) (27, 1.) (28, 1.) row 1: (1, 1.) (2, 1.)
(3, 1.) (6, 1.) (16, 1.) (17, 1.) (18, 1.) (21, 1.)
Hi All,
I was wondering if the coloring approaches listed online are working? Which
ones are in parallel, and which ones are in sequential?
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Mat/MatColoringType.html#MatColoringType
If the coloring is in parallel, can it be used with
You are also calling the AMG setup a lot, but not spending much time
> in it. Try running with -info and grep on "GAMG".
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> > Thanks, Barry.
> >
> > It works.
> >
Hi All,
I am using GAMG to solve a group of coupled diffusion equations, but the
resulting matrix is not symmetrical. I got the following error messages:
*[0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc has generated inconsistent data[0]PETSC ERROR: Have
un-symmetric graph (apparently). Use
I will try.
>
> Note, you should not see much degradation as you increase the number of
> levels. 18145 eqs on a 3D problem will probably be noticeable. I generally
> aim for about 3000.
>
It should be fine as long as the coarse problem is solved by a parallel
solver.
Fande,
>
>
Thanks, Mark and Barry,
It works pretty wells in terms of the number of linear iterations (using
"-pc_gamg_sym_graph true"), but it is horrible in the compute time. I am
using the two-level method via "-pc_mg_levels 2". The reason why the
compute time is larger than other preconditioning options
Hi All,
The EPSViewer in SLEPc looks weird. I do not understand the viewer logic.
For example there is a piece of code in SLEPc (at line 225 of epsview.c):
*if (!ispower) { if (!eps->ds) { ierr =
EPSGetDS(eps,>ds);CHKERRQ(ierr); } ierr =
DSView(eps->ds,viewer);CHKERRQ(ierr);
4 4 1 4 1 4 4 1 4 51328
GAMG: createProl 40 1.0 8.3786e+01 1.0 4.56e+09 2.3 9.6e+06 2.5e+04
4.8e+03 21 42 12 32 10 21 42 12 32 10 14134
GAMG: partLevel 40 1.0 6.7755e+00 1.1 2.59e+08 2.3 2.9e+06 2.5e+03
1.5e+03 2 2 4 1 3 2 2 4 1 3 9431
>
>
>
e:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Mark Adams <mfad...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> You seem to have two levels here and 3M eqs on the fine grid and 37 on
&
Hi All,
The NONE norm type is supported only when CG is used with a right
preconditioner. Any reason for this?
*0 Nonlinear |R| = 1.732051e+00 0 Linear |R| = 0.00e+00 1
Linear |R| = 0.00e+00
ditioning.
>
> Barry
>
> > On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The NONE norm type is supported only when CG is used with a right
> preconditioner. Any reason for this?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Uploaded to google drive, and sent you links in another email. Not sure
> if it works or not.
> >
> > Fande,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Barry Sm
> Thanks. Even the symbolic is slower for BAIJ. I don't like that, it
> definitely should not be since it is (at least should be) doing a symbolic
> factorization on a symbolic matrix 1/11th the size!
> >
> >Keep us informed.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mar
7, at 10:33 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please tell us how you got this output.
> >
> > PETSc CG doesn't even implement right preconditioning. If you ask for
> it it should error out. CG supports no norm computation with left
Hi All,
What is the definition of KSPNormType natural? It is easy to understand
none, preconditioned, and unpreconditioned, but not natural.
Fande Kong,
Hi All,
I am solving a nonlinear system whose Jacobian matrix has a block
structure. More precisely, there is a mesh, and for each vertex there are
11 variables associated with it. I am using BAIJ.
I thought block ILU(k) should be more efficient than the point-wise ILU(k).
After some numerical
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Patrick Sanan <patrick.sa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am solving a nonlinear system whose Jacobian matrix has a block
> structure.
lve_SeqBAIJ_11_NaturalOrdering_ver1;
> > } else {
> >C->ops->solve = MatSolve_SeqBAIJ_N_NaturalOrdering;
> > }
> >
> > Rerun and look at the new -log_view. Send all three -log_view to use
> at this point. If this optimization helps and now
> > Mat
9:08 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks. Even the symbolic is slower for BAIJ. I don't like that, it
>> definitely should not be since it is (at least should be) doing a symbolic
>> factorization on a symbolic matrix 1/11th the size!
>>
I found one issue on my side. The preallocation is not right for the BAIJ
matrix. Will this slow down MatLUFactor and MatSolve?
How to converge AIJ to BAIJ using a command-line option?
Fande,
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote:
> "Kong, F
t; MatLUFactorNum 1 1.0 6.0118e-02 1.0 2.55e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
> > 0.0e+00 42 89 0 0 0 72 89 0 0 0 4241
> > MatILUFactorSym1 1.0 6.7251e-03 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00
> > 0.0e+00 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
> >
> &g
gov> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Mark and Barry,
> >
> > It works pretty wells in terms of the number of linear iterations (using
> "-pc_gamg_sym_graph true"), but it is horrible
Thanks, Jose
Fande,
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Jose E. Roman <jro...@dsic.upv.es> wrote:
> I have pushed a commit that should avoid this problem.
> Jose
>
> > El 6 abr 2017, a las 22:27, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> escribió:
> >
> > Hi All,
>
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 7, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
&
Thanks, Barry and Satish,
It makes sense.
Fande,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Satish,
> >
> > One more que
message.
Looks possible for me.
Fande,
>
> Barry
>
>
> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We configured PETSc with a version of MVAPICH, and complied with another
> version of MVAPICH. Got th
replaces it with MVAPICH2_NUMVERSION
> >
> > Satish
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Kong, Fande wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >The error mes
Hi,
We configured PETSc with a version of MVAPICH, and complied with another
version of MVAPICH. Got the error messages:
*error "PETSc was configured with one MPICH mpi.h version but now appears
to be compiling using a different MPICH mpi.h version"*
Why we could not say something about
Hi All,
How to understand the following messages:
1 EPS nconv=0 first unconverged value (error) 2.06312 (3.29164033e-01)
2 EPS nconv=0 first unconverged value (error) 2.03951 (1.76223074e-01)
3 EPS nconv=0 first unconverged value (error) 2.01177 (5.71109559e-02)
4 EPS nconv=0 first
wrote:
>
> > El 16 ago 2017, a las 21:36, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> escribió:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > How to understand the following messages:
> >
> > 1 EPS nconv=0 first unconverged value (error) 2.06312 (3.29164033e-01)
> > 2 E
Hi,
I am using the current master branch. The log_view gives me the summary as
follows, and the "WARNING" box repeats three times. Are we intending to do
so?
Thanks,
Fande,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Kannan, Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> Barry,
>
> Thanks for the kind response. I am building slepc 3.7.3 and when I
> configure –with-64-bit-indices=1, I am getting the following error.
>
> ./configure --with-64-bit-indices=1 --prefix=/lustre/atlas/proj-
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com>
> wrote
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Adriano Côrtes
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Matthew,
>>
>> Thank you for your return. It worked, but this prompts another question.
>> So why PetscViewer does not write
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>
lers do not.
> >
> > Basically xcode clang can pick up includes from the xcode specific
> > location - but other tools look for includes in /usr/incldue
> >
> > And 'xcode-select --install' adds the /usr/include etc links.
> >
> > Satish
> >
> &
hard
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote:
>
>> "Kong, Fande" <fande.k...@inl.gov> writes:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I just upgraded MAC OS, and also updated all other related packages.
>
Calling PCFactorSetMatOrderingType() (or command line option:
-pc_factor_mat_ordering_type) to use RCM or 1WD usually helps me a lot. My
application is based on highly-unstructured meshes.
Fande,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Rachit Prasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to
Hi,
There is a heat conduction problem. When superlu_dist is used as a
preconditioner, we have random results from different runs. Is there a
random algorithm in superlu_dist? If we use ASM or MUMPS as the
preconditioner, we then don't have this issue.
run 1:
0 Nonlinear |R| = 9.447423e+03
= 9.447423e+03
1 Linear |R| = 1.360637e-11
1 Nonlinear |R| = 1.654334e-11
>
> Barry
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@m
to superlu_dist.
Fande,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Meaningless differences
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There i
different "physical results"?
>
Let me update a little bit more. The simulation with SuperLU may fail at
certain time step. Sometime we can also run the simulation successfully
for the whole time range. It is totally random.
We will try ASM and MUMPS.
Fande,
>
> Barry
&
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2017, at 3:36 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Barry,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. I was wondering why this happens only when
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Klaij, Christiaan wrote:
> Satish,
>
>
>
> As a first try, I've kept petsc-3.7.5 and only replaced superlu
>
> by the new xsdk-0.2.0-rc1 version. Unfortunately, this doesn't
>
> fix the problem, see the backtrace below.
>
>
>
> Fande,
>
>
>
>
We had exactly the same issue when upgraded compilers. I guess this is
somehow related to gfortran. A simple way to work around for us is to
change* if with_rpath*: to * if False *at line 54 of
config/BuildSystem/config/libraries.py.
Not sure if it works for you.
Fande,
On Mon, Oct 30,
Hi All,
I am trying to solve a generalized eigenvalue problem (using SLEPc) with
"-eps_type krylovschur -st_type sinvert". I got an error message: "Must
select a target sorting criterion if using shift-and-invert".
Not sure how to proceed. I do not quite understand this sentence.
Fande,
Hi PETSc Team,
I was wondering if "snes_type test" has been gone? Quite a few MOOSE users
use this option to test their Jacobian matrices.
If it is gone, any reason?
Fande,
snes_test_jacobian
> instead. Note that the test is done every time the Jacobian is computed.
>
> It was meant to be "-snes_type test".
>
> > Hong (Mr.)
> >
> >> On Jun 4, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Kong, Fande wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi PETSc T
stions wrt theta builds.
>>
>> Satish
>>
>> On Thu, 3 May 2018, Satish Balay wrote:
>>
>> > Perhaps you should use MKL on theta? Again check
>> config/examples/arch-cray-xc40-knl-opt.py
>> >
>> > Satish
>> >
>> > On Th
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 26, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Smith, Barry F. <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov
Are you not just using -snes_mf
> or -snes_mf_operator? Can you send me a sample code that has the extra
> function evaluations? Because if you run through regular usage with the
> debugger you will see there is no extra evaluation.
>
>Barry
>
>
> > On Jan 26, 2018,
Hi,
I want to generate manul.pdf from source files on my own desktop.
In directory: ./src/docs/tex/manual
make ALL LOC=/Users/kongf/projects/petsc
* make: *** No rule to make target
`/Users/kongf/projects/petsc/docs/manualpages/htmlmap', needed by
`listing_kspex1tmp.tex'. Stop.*
What else
Jan 27, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to generate manul.pdf from source files on my own desktop.
>>
>> In directory: ./src/docs/tex/manual
>>
>> make ALL LOC=/Users/kongf/projects/petsc
>
Curious about the comparison of 16x4 VS 64.
Fande,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bakytzhan Kallemov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure about 64 flat run,
>
> unfortunately I did not save logs since it's easy to run, but for 16 -
> here is the plot I got for different number
rkhome/projects/petsc-3.7.7/arch-linux2-c-opt-
> 64bit/externalpackages/git.hypre
> git rev-parse --git-dir
> echo $?
> git fsck
>
> If this works - you can rerun configure and see if the error persists
>
> Satish
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > Hi PETSc team:
> >
> > What is the possible reason for this?
> >
> > The log file is attached.
> >
> >
> > Fande,
> >
>
>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > > If you need to workarround this - you can comment out that test
> (3lines)..
> > >
> > > File "/home/kongf/workhome/projec
Command([self.sourceControl.git,
> 'rev-parse','--git-dir'], cwd=self.packageDir, log = self.log)
>
>
"#self.updateGitDir()" works.
I still do not understand why.
Fande,
>
> Satish
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > [kongf@falcon1 git.h
;ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > > I meant just the 3 lines - not the whole function.
> >
> > I knew this. "3 lines" does not work at all.
> >
> > I forgot the error message.
>
> Then you are likely to
moose]$ uname -a
Linux falcon1 3.0.101-108.13-default #1 SMP Wed Oct 11 12:30:40 UTC 2017
(294ccfe) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
moose]$ lsb_release -a
LSB Version:
1 or falcon2 does it still fail?
>
> module load git/2.16.2-GCCcore-5.4.0
>
> Thanks,
> Cormac.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Cormac,
>>
>> Do you know anything on "git"?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote:
> "Kong, Fande" <fande.k...@inl.gov> writes:
>
> > Updated:
> >
> > If switch to a different version of git. The configuration is going to
> > work.
> >
> >
>
module load git/2.16.2-GCCcore-5.4.0" also works.
Could you somehow make the default git work as well? Hence we do not need
to have this extra "module load for git"
Fande,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Kong, Fande <fande.k...@inl.gov> wrote:
> Thanks, Cormac,
>
[i.e old glibc etc..] - and
> this new git version [binary built locally or on a different OS and
> installed locally ?].
>
> Satish
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > moose]$ uname -a
> > Linux falcon1 3.0.101-108.13-default #1 SMP Wed Oct 11 12:3
iguring PETSc.
>>
>> The manually loaded *gits* work just fine.
>>
>>
>> Fande,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Garvey, Cormac T <cormac.gar...@inl.gov>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I though it was fixed, yes I will look into it again.
at ? MAT_REUSE_MATRIX :
> MAT_INITIAL_MATRIX,>hpmat);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>} else {
>
> ierr = PetscObjectReference((PetscObject)pc->pmat);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
> ierr = MatDestroy(>hpmat);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
>
> 2018-04-02 23:46 GMT+02:00 Kong
Why we can not use MPI_COMM_WORLD?
Fande,
>
> Satish
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to upgrade PETSc from 3.7.6 to 3.8.3 for MOOSE and its
> > applications. I have a error message for a standard te
FWMgkK9yEScbLA7pkrWydFuJnYflsU=_
> zpWRcyk3kHuEHoq02NDqYExnXIohXpNnjyabYnnDjU=
>
> Satish
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > Does this 'standard test' use MPI_COM
Hi All,
I am trying to upgrade PETSc from 3.7.6 to 3.8.3 for MOOSE and its
applications. I have a error message for a standard test:
*preconditioners/pbp.lots_of_variables: MPI had an
errorpreconditioners/pbp.lots_of_variables:
Figured out:
The reason is that in MatCreate_HYPRE(Mat B), we call MPI_Comm_dup
instead of PetscCommDuplicate. The PetscCommDuplicate is better, and it
does not actually create a communicator if the communicator is already
known to PETSc.
Furthermore, I do not think we should a comm in
e hypre is needed to generate subcomms, perhaps it generates
> too many?
> >>
> >> Barry
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:07 PM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I’m working with Fande on this an
t;
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Stefano Zampini <stefano.zamp...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2018, at 4:58 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Kong, Fande wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Stefano Zampini wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Apr 3, 2018, at 4:58 PM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Kong, Fande
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo