Re: [petsc-users] Compiling with PETSc 64-bit indices

2018-02-22 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:24 AM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > > On 21/2/2018 9:12 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > >> >> On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY

Re: [petsc-users] Compiling with PETSc 64-bit indices

2018-02-21 Thread TAY wee-beng
On 21/2/2018 9:12 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng > wrote: On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng >

Re: [petsc-users] Compiling with PETSc 64-bit indices

2018-02-20 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > > On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total grid >> size =

Re: [petsc-users] Compiling with PETSc 64-bit indices

2018-02-20 Thread TAY wee-beng
On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng > wrote: Hi, When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total grid size =    624828339 ), I got the error saying I need to

Re: [petsc-users] Compiling with PETSc 64-bit indices

2018-02-20 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > Hi, > > When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total grid size > =624828339 ), I got the error saying I need to compile PETSc with > 64-bit indices. > > So I tried to compile PETSc again and then