On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:24 AM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
>
> On 21/2/2018 9:12 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY
On 21/2/2018 9:12 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng > wrote:
On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng >
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:08 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
>
> On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total grid
>> size =
On 21/2/2018 9:00 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng > wrote:
Hi,
When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total
grid size = 624828339 ), I got the error saying I need to
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run my CFD code with a grid size of 1119x1119x499 ( total grid size
> =624828339 ), I got the error saying I need to compile PETSc with
> 64-bit indices.
>
> So I tried to compile PETSc again and then