Damien Miller wrote:
Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:49:52PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
Comments?
I guess the additional two numbers don't bloat the state entry too much.
I'm not doing any accounting, so I'm not sure if this is a problem, but
the numbers a:b will be
I hate to post this again but I was having some problem with bounced
messages from the list so I had to subscribe from another address. Any
help would be appreciated. Or if anyone see's anything wrong with my
pf.conf it would be highly appreciated if it was pointed out to me.
I tried to setup
I tried to setup queing based on the faq and website. But I just can't
get it to work. Downloading is great but as soon as I start to upload
my speed drops way down to about the same speed as the upload. I have
played around with the queue statements and bandwidth settings but no
luck. I am
Nah my adsl link does not require PPOE thank GOODNESS.
-Original Message-
From: Volker Kindermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Elijah Savage
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Queing on ADSL ACK's
I tried to setup queing based on the faq and
On Thursday, Jun 19, 2003, at 06:30 US/Pacific, Elijah Savage wrote:
I tried to setup queing based on the faq and website. But I just can't
get it to work. Downloading is great but as soon as I start to upload
my
speed drops way down to about the same speed as the upload. I have
played around
On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 13:16 US/Pacific, David Chubb wrote:
I have set net.inet.esp.enable=1 in the sysctl.conf (and rebooted to
make
sure the changes took).
This is just to enable support on the box itself. It doesn't affect
packet passing.
However to connect to a remote RDP (Remote
Hi all,
Using OBSD3.3, I'm trying to add a couple of rules for a user using the
authpf mechanism. The rules need to go atop my normal ruleset (as defined in
my pf.conf), and I don't see how to achieve this documented anywhere. Put
another way: the default placement for rules added via authpf is
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:04:17PM -0700, Kevin R. Smith wrote:
FWIW, in the 3.2 docs it was done using [head|tail], though I couldn't find
great documentation on that either--my efforts at apply 3.2 syntax in 3.3
have failed. Presumably this feature still exists, and I'm not seeing how to
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Trevor Talbot wrote:
I did add the following rules to the pf.conf and reloaded them,
however they
do no good.
pass out on $ext proto esp from $ournet to any
pass in on $ext proto esp from any to any
If you are BINATing or RDRing, you may need the patches that are
On Thursday 19 June 2003 23:21, Trevor Talbot wrote:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if flags S/SA keep
state queue (q_def, q_pri)
You probably don't want this one, since you have the more-selective
rule above.
Isn't it just unneeded to add queuing rules for inbound packets
On Thursday, Jun 19, 2003, at 17:14 US/Pacific, David Le Corfec wrote:
On Thursday 19 June 2003 23:21, Trevor Talbot wrote:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if flags S/SA keep
state queue (q_def, q_pri)
You probably don't want this one, since you have the more-selective
rule above.
11 matches
Mail list logo