On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:02:28 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nope, rdr rules at all
So you probably are using binat, aren't you?.. well, try to use tcpdump and
pflog to figure out what is going on..
P.S.: I would recommend VNC instead of XP remote assistantance(tm) :)
--
Tiago Pierez
I've finally gotten around to setting up 3.3 on a test system and hopefully
soon will deploy it in production.
At an operating system level, version 3.3 seems to have improved kernel
memory management. My system has 512 MB of RAM. Under 3.1, I was unable to
increase NMBCLUSTERS past 4096 without
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:09:36AM +0100, Pedro Marcolino wrote:
> I've already read that thread , but the URL(
> http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more.
I wrote it, and I don't think any of it is applicable to you. It was
for "broken" implementations which ign
Nope, rdr rules at all
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Tiago Pierezan Camargo wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:37:24 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I eliminated the Rules by dropping them for a minute, using pfctl -Fr,
Humm.. Just to be sure.. Do you have any rdr rule?
Tiago
--
Tiago P
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 10:47, Dieter Kasielke wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200
> > Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a
> > > bridge. Your seco
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200
> Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a
> > bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not?
>
> In my settin
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200
Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a
> bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not?
In my setting, they actually are in the same subnet. The bridge "divides" the
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port $ut2003 ->$justin_machine
ut2003 = "{,7778,7787,7788,28900,28902,80}"
Port 80 if you want the webserver accessible
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port $ut ->$justin_machine
ut = "{,7778,7779,7780,7781,80}"
Port 80 if you w
NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a
bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not?
Hope this helps,
Jan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Marc Balmer
Sent: woensdag 20 augustus 2003 7:33
Dave Beckstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> When a user tries to connect I see a connecting message on the IRC
> server and then they are disconnected. I have all the IRC and web
> server ports open.
Does the IRC server attempt to gather hostname/ident information
from the client? Some of them
Hi,
I've already read that thread , but the URL(
http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more.
Regards,
Pedro
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:54:13 -0700
Trevor Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, Aug 18, 2003, at 15:50 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo