Re: NAT problem

2003-08-20 Thread Tiago Pierezan Camargo
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:02:28 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nope, rdr rules at all So you probably are using binat, aren't you?.. well, try to use tcpdump and pflog to figure out what is going on.. P.S.: I would recommend VNC instead of XP remote assistantance(tm) :) -- Tiago Pierez

upgrade to 3.3

2003-08-20 Thread Paul B. Henson
I've finally gotten around to setting up 3.3 on a test system and hopefully soon will deploy it in production. At an operating system level, version 3.3 seems to have improved kernel memory management. My system has 512 MB of RAM. Under 3.1, I was unable to increase NMBCLUSTERS past 4096 without

Re: SecureRemote

2003-08-20 Thread Jolan Luff
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:09:36AM +0100, Pedro Marcolino wrote: > I've already read that thread , but the URL( > http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more. I wrote it, and I don't think any of it is applicable to you. It was for "broken" implementations which ign

Re: NAT problem

2003-08-20 Thread duncan
Nope, rdr rules at all On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Tiago Pierezan Camargo wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:37:24 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I eliminated the Rules by dropping them for a minute, using pfctl -Fr, Humm.. Just to be sure.. Do you have any rdr rule? Tiago -- Tiago P

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 10:47, Dieter Kasielke wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 > > Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a > > > bridge. Your seco

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Dieter Kasielke
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:22:56 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 > Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a > > bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not? > > In my settin

Re: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Marc Balmer
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:36 +0200 Jan Roeloffzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a > bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not? In my setting, they actually are in the same subnet. The bridge "divides" the

RE: Redirection (Unreal Tournament)

2003-08-20 Thread Amir Seyavash Mesry
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port $ut2003 ->$justin_machine ut2003 = "{,7778,7787,7788,28900,28902,80}" Port 80 if you want the webserver accessible rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port $ut ->$justin_machine ut = "{,7778,7779,7780,7781,80}" Port 80 if you w

RE: Redirecting bridge

2003-08-20 Thread Jan Roeloffzen
NETWORK and SERVERS should be on the same subnet to make it work with a bridge. Your second setting with routers suggests they are not? Hope this helps, Jan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Balmer Sent: woensdag 20 augustus 2003 7:33

Re: Java Chat / PF Filter

2003-08-20 Thread Greg Wooledge
Dave Beckstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > When a user tries to connect I see a connecting message on the IRC > server and then they are disconnected. I have all the IRC and web > server ports open. Does the IRC server attempt to gather hostname/ident information from the client? Some of them

Re: SecureRemote

2003-08-20 Thread Pedro Marcolino
Hi, I've already read that thread , but the URL( http://www.cryptonomicon.org/notes/vpn_nat.html ) is not working any more. Regards, Pedro On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:54:13 -0700 Trevor Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, Aug 18, 2003, at 15:50 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >