Does putting borrow on all child queues make any sense?
The way I read it, it does, so like a child queue that isn't using its
bandwidth, can be borrowed by a sibling queue, is that correct?
--
Security Guru for Hire http://www.lightconsulting.com/~travis/ --
GPG fingerprint: 9D3F 395A DAC5 5CCC
What would be the appropriate way to submit additions to the PF FAQ
and/or pf.conf manpage? Specifically, what is the source format,
where can I get the source (for the FAQ, I know where to get the
unformatted manpage), and to whom exactly should I send the diffs?
TIA
--
Security Guru for Hire
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:04:23PM -0400, Gabriel Wachman wrote:
If NAT translation happens BEFORE any filter rules are evaluated
(see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html), then wouldn't it be
true that an outbound packet from the internal network will be
seen by the filtering engine as a
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:09:30PM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
What would be the appropriate way to submit additions to the PF FAQ
and/or pf.conf manpage? Specifically, what is the source format,
where can I get the source (for the FAQ, I know where to get the
unformatted manpage), and to whom
On 4/7/06, Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does putting borrow on all child queues make any sense?
The way I read it, it does, so like a child queue that isn't using its
bandwidth, can be borrowed by a sibling queue, is that correct?
That's how it appeared to work in my tests.
--Bill
Hello
I have two (unreleated) questions - the first one regarding new
ftp-proxy (the one using anchors) and the other regarding company
example in official obsd faq
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html#example2)
1)...
This is how I understand pf + ftp-proxy functionality:
First, two
