On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> If someone with ports-foo has any suggestions about how to split pfstatd
> into a separate package (so a package containing only pfstatd could be
> installed on firewalls without any dependancies), please speak up ;)
Patch against
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:06:16PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > -DISTNAME= pfstat-2.0
> > -PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}
> > +V= 2.0
> > +DISTNAME= pfstat-${V}
> > +PKGNAME= pfstat-${V}
> > +PKGNAME-daemon=pfstat-daemon-${V}
>
> How about making the PKGNAME for the daemon be pfstatd-${V}
And M
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 04:27:31PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> > If someone with ports-foo has any suggestions about how to split pfstatd
> > into a separate package (so a package containing only pfstatd could be
> > installed
Here's a major update to pfstat. The most important changes:
* Add a small daemon 'pfstatd' which listens on a TCP port and, when
connected to, sends the statistical pf data in plain text to the
peer. This program has no dependancies (gd, X11, etc.), so it can
be easily installed on a small
