On 5/19/06, Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just plug one of the LAN ports into your existing network and leave
the WAN unused.
Really? I found that my traffic to the internet wasn't getting routed
when I did this.
Oh... yeah, it has to have an IP on my LAN... which is not 192.168.1/24.
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:06:17AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
On 5/19/06, Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just plug one of the LAN ports into your existing network and leave
the WAN unused.
Really? I found that my traffic to the internet wasn't getting routed
when I did this.
Oh...
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:40:35AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
On 5/19/06, Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to get directly to the web intervace with my laptop
connected to one of the ports. I gave the wrt 192.168.1.9 and then put
that address into firefox and there it was. I didn't have
Re: the linksys wrt54g
Just plug one of the LAN ports into your existing network and leave
the WAN unused.
Turn off the DHCP server and give the linksys device a proper IP on
your network.
The stock firmware supports this. This is how I am bridging the
wireless linksys network to
my
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:31:39PM -0400, Lou wrote:
Re: the linksys wrt54g
Just plug one of the LAN ports into your existing network and leave
the WAN unused.
Turn off the DHCP server and give the linksys device a proper IP on
your network.
The stock firmware supports this. This is
On 5/16/06, Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't decide if it would be best for the firewall to be transparant
or not.
If you're talking about bridging, then that's in direct conflict with
your desire to admin it from the outside. The only way to admin a
bridging firewall is on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Travis H. wrote:
If you're talking about bridging, then that's in direct conflict with
your desire to admin it from the outside. The only way to admin a
bridging firewall is on the keyboard and monitor directly attached to
it. It is also
I'm a newbie at networking and I've been reading Building Firewalls
with OpenBSD and PF and a couple of other resources. I have a pdf of
how I'm thinking about setting up my home network.
http://tyson.homeunix.org/net.pdf
Page 2 gives the policies/functionality I would like to have. I want
On 5/16/06, Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page 2 gives the policies/functionality I would like to have. I want
the system to be secure but I would also like to be able to admin the
system from the outside.
You want your cake AND you want to eat it? Ambitious!
Mostly, there is the threat of
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:41:51AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
You want your cake AND you want to eat it? Ambitious!
Perhaps a little too ambitious for my level of experience. ;p
snip
Thanks for the input. I think I'll simplify the plan a little till I
can get more experience with pf.
--
Terry
I recommend that you use the RFC1918 class B block. 172.16-32.x.x
I've seen networks that use 10/8 or 192.168/16 internally, and if you
have something like a laptop that needs to travel between your network
and others, things can get hairy when IP addresses conflict.
I've had to renumber my
I have a cable connection at home and was wondering if the following
would work. If I put a Cisco 851 series router in front of a pair of
Soekris firewalls running OpenBSD using CARP and pfsync. So the Cisco
router would get a dynamic WAN IP and have a static LAN IP. The two
Soekris firewalls
On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:25 pm, Phusion wrote:
I have a cable connection at home and was wondering if the following
would work. If I put a Cisco 851 series router in front of a pair of
Soekris firewalls running OpenBSD using CARP and pfsync. So the Cisco
router would get a dynamic WAN IP and
on the cable side? Also, I don't really
understand the need for redundant firewalls (especially for a home
network). I would expect the soekris box to be one of the least likely
points of failure. CARP and pfsync sounds like overkill.
I have a soekris 4801 with a 20Gig HD and a CM9 wireless card. It runs
14 matches
Mail list logo
