Thank you Daniel. Just a suggestion-- someone might want to add this
to the docs, very good thing to know.
On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:34 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:28:28AM -0800, Daniel Duerr wrote:
I understand from the pf documentation (and logic) that you cannot
On 11:28, Wed 27 Feb 08, Daniel Duerr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I understand from the pf documentation (and logic) that you cannot
> queue incoming packets on an interface, makes sense... In various
> examples around the net, however, I've seen people attaching queues
> to inbound rules as well.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:28:28AM -0800, Daniel Duerr wrote:
> I understand from the pf documentation (and logic) that you cannot
> queue incoming packets on an interface, makes sense... In various
> examples around the net, however, I've seen people attaching queues
> to inbound rules as
Hello,
I understand from the pf documentation (and logic) that you cannot
queue incoming packets on an interface, makes sense... In various
examples around the net, however, I've seen people attaching queues
to inbound rules as well. I'm confused as to whether this is just a
mistake or
Peter Huncar wrote:
So I create a state that will pass packets belonging to this connection
through both interfaces, on one interface and they will be assigned to the
queue on the other interface without creating any explicit pass rule for
this interface to assign the packet to the correct queue (b
On 4/13/05, Peter Huncar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Only two simple questions (I hope). I'm trying to shape traffic between
> several subnets (some in form of VLANs and some have own physical interface)
>
> Is possible something like this?
>
Anything is possible..
> Just an example
>
Hi
Only two simple questions (I hope). I'm trying to shape traffic between
several subnets (some in form of VLANs and some have own physical interface)
Is possible something like this?
Just an example
Subnet 1 -- fxp0 - OpenBSD - fxp1 --- Subnet 2
altq on $fxp0 bandwidth 100% cbq queue{
