On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:07:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I am definitely taking notes!...about how many interfaces are there in a
(GENERIC) kernel? I hadn't even though about them.(ruff estimate's ok, a
specific answer would just be a wasted on me) ~=)
too many. write a short
, I'm not saying we need to do it. I don't know.
You're raising some good points. Yor example, 'pfctl -si'
would clearly need to take an extra argument, like 'pfctl -si fxp0'
Yes, this will make the kernel a bit more complicated,
but also note that it will make the userland simpler. i.e,
set
Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: set loginterface
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you only want one because - In order to keep with the *nix ethic of one
tool
one job - a singular loginterface gives you one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you only want one because - In order to keep with the *nix ethic of one tool
one job - a singular loginterface gives you one point of contact for your
tool of choice for splitting out your various types of logs - i.e.. pipe it
through grep tee orsee?
I'm looking at
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:24:39PM +0100, Cedric Berger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you only want one because - In order to keep with the *nix ethic of one
tool
one job - a singular loginterface gives you one point of contact for your
tool of choice for splitting out your various types
