On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:40:39PM -0500, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
the main problem is that all of the MX hosts for the
domain(s) covered by the mail server running spamd
have to filter the same list of ip addresses.
otherwise they just remail it to the lower priority
MX when it fails w/ the
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Daniel Hartmeier:
Actually, checking some statistics, the spews list catches a significant
percentage of spam coming directly from open relays. The spam that still
gets through is coming mostly from mailing list servers. These are not
open
I read recently about the new pf-based spam filter included in
openbsd(-current?).
There has been talk about rebuilding our mailserver, so I'm wondering if
this is a good way to go.
Anyone using this yet?
--
Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:42:09PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
Anyone using this yet?
It doesn't catch a very large percentage of spam here, as spammers use
much more relays than are listed in any database I could find. Spews.org
lists about 15000. So you'll still need spamassassin/bmf to detect
Interesting, I think I will give might try to convince the powers at
large to move to openbsd, we are currently on caldera linux, and I must
say, I hate it. :-/
Thanks Daniel.
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 16:35, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
Actually, checking some statistics, the spews list catches a
