On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 10:36:27PM -0800, Jason wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list, and fairly new to OpenBSD (installed maybe 6 months ago).
Anyway, I have a question. Is there anywhere to get PF to stop arp requests
from passing through it? The problem I'm having is dhcp requests from
I see, so if dhcpd and pf weren't sharing the same interface, then I wouldn't
have this problem.
I guess limiting dhcpd wouldn't be the best thing, but improving pf. Is
anyone working on adding such a feature to pf to make it block these kinds of
requests? Seems like it'd be helpful.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:55:07AM -0800, Jason wrote:
I guess limiting dhcpd wouldn't be the best thing, but improving pf. Is
anyone working on adding such a feature to pf to make it block these kinds of
requests? Seems like it'd be helpful. Otherwise, seems like that's somewhat
of a
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:55:07AM -0800, Jason wrote:
I see, so if dhcpd and pf weren't sharing the same interface, then I wouldn't
have this problem.
I guess limiting dhcpd wouldn't be the best thing, but improving pf. Is
anyone working on adding such a feature to pf to make it block
Gotcha, I guess I learn something new everyday.
So the danger is really running and layer 2 daemon on the same interface as pf
and trying to filter it. I guess this would serve as a solution for the time
being, I'll tell dhcpd to not listen on rl1, and then:
rdr on rl1 proto udp from any to
Hello,
Never was able to get squid running on the firewall. Setup firewall to use
round-robin direct connections.
Without going around and changing all the workstations from using the proxy,
is there a way I can redirect lan connections to the firewall to port 3128
to the net on port 80.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 07:07:04PM -0700, j knight wrote:
It sounds to me like he's setup his clients to use squid but has now
decided to ditch squid. He wants to do trickery with pf so that he
doesn't have to go around again to each client and remove the proxy
settings.
ahh!; yes, i
