Re: OT - NAT on IPsec

2006-09-20 Thread Andrea Mistrali
Il giorno 14 set 2006, alle ore 13:27, Andrea Mistrali ha scritto: Hi to all!, sorry for being a little bit OT, but maybe you could answer my question :) I have a customer that uses 192.168.0.0/24 on his LAN and is protected by a firewall based on OpenBSD 3.6 with PF. He needs to bring

OT - NAT on IPsec

2006-09-14 Thread Andrea Mistrali
Hi to all!, sorry for being a little bit OT, but maybe you could answer my question :) I have a customer that uses 192.168.0.0/24 on his LAN and is protected by a firewall based on OpenBSD 3.6 with PF. He needs to bring up an IPSEC tunnel to another entity with ISAKMPD and I am the

Re: Problems with state syncronisation

2005-02-15 Thread Andrea Mistrali
Il giorno 14 feb 2005, alle 18:06, Ryan McBride ha scritto: On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:20:44AM +0100, Andrea Mistrali wrote: Those lines are always relative to broadcast addresses. What can it be? If a packet reaches both firewalls, they will both create state; when they each recieve the state

Problems with state syncronisation

2005-02-14 Thread Andrea Mistrali
ext: xxx.xxx.xxy.10:137 (from sync) Those lines are always relative to broadcast addresses. What can it be? TIA -- Andrea Mistrali I.NET 2 s.r.l. I.NET Group: Managed Internet Connectivity