Re: Another clue why pf didn't meet goal in first test

2004-03-17 Thread Greg Hennessy
On 16 Mar 2004 04:33:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Hansson) wrote: i know, some must see that i've turned into an HFSC _whore_ and would likely use it to make nutritous and delicious milkshakes in the morning if i could , but it is enjoyable. Well, your advice to me have

Re: Another clue why pf didn't meet goal in first test

2004-03-16 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:54:36PM -0500, Dr. David Johnson wrote: I think the only other data that may help is that my friend says his DSL link is supposed to be 144 up, and 288 down, but in using some Internet sites that are supposed to measure speed, these show downloads of only about a

Re: Another clue why pf didn't meet goal in first test

2004-03-16 Thread Lars Hansson
if it is just a queueing problem, first thing i would think to do is fix the $ext_if bandwidth setting... i don't know VoIP, but perhaps it doesn't need to use alot of bandwidth, but wants a low delay. consider HFSC? Speaking from my, very short, experience HFSC seems to be the

Another clue why pf didn't meet goal in first test

2004-03-15 Thread Dr. David Johnson
Okay, I think I found some stuff on the Vonage site that gave me clues as to why I got the results in my testing. Please you pf gurus, can you give me feedback? Below is the testing I did (from previous message for background), and I found that maybe I am not getting the pf function when I have