Re: Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-23 Thread jared r r spiegel
Queuing doesn't make sense inbound anyway; once you've received the packet, it has already consumed your bandwidth, and thus queuing won't change anything. queueing could delay ACK reply being sent and then whole connection would get throttled. it works really fine with

Re: Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-21 Thread Magne J. Andreassen
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 12:23 +0200, Stanislaw Halik wrote: Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Queuing doesn't make sense inbound anyway; once you've received the packet, it has already consumed your bandwidth, and thus queuing won't change anything. queueing could delay ACK reply being

Re: Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-20 Thread Travis H.
The docs say that you can't queue on an inbound packet. Queuing doesn't make sense inbound anyway; once you've received the packet, it has already consumed your bandwidth, and thus queuing won't change anything. -- http://www.lightconsulting.com/~travis/ -- We already have enough fast, insecure

Re: Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-20 Thread Stanislaw Halik
Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Queuing doesn't make sense inbound anyway; once you've received the packet, it has already consumed your bandwidth, and thus queuing won't change anything. queueing could delay ACK reply being sent and then whole connection would get throttled. it works

Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-18 Thread Luke Fogarty
Hi I'm sharing a connection and I'm trying to set aside bandwidth for some users. Here is the pftop -v queue log QUEUEBANDW SCH PRIO PKTSBYTES DROP_P DROP_B QLEN BORROW SUSPENDS P/S B/S std_outpriq 350

Re: Problem with altq cbq queuing.. please assist?

2005-10-18 Thread Lars Hansson
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:20:25 +1000 Luke Fogarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #allow all traffic to and from lan pass in on $int_if from $int_if:network to any keep state As I said in my reply to you in misc@, when you're keeping state queue assigment works a little bit differently. You need to