On 12/31/05, ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:41:38 +0100
Marcin Miksowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any solution to resolve my problems with carp? If there is
necessary to show You more informations on my current configuration I
will do everything what I only
On 1/5/06, Marcin Miksowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] # cat
/etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.255 vhid 1 carpdev em1
advskew 1 pass 31337
# cat /etc/hostname.carp1
inet 111.111.111.13 255.255.255.0 111.111.111.255 vhid 2 carpdev em0
advskew 1 pass 31337
# cat
On 1/5/06, Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been following your problem.
You have net.inet.carp.preempt=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf?
If not then that's likely your problem. (Then reboot
or man sysctl.)
Yes, I have preempt enabled:
fw1:
# sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt
hello,
I noticed in your original email that fw2 had advskews of 10's and
100's. This suggests that CARP may not be setup the way you think it
is (based on the asvskew 240 in the hostname files).
The difference appear, when I have testing various configurations. Now
I have advskew equal on
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:41:38 +0100
Marcin Miksowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any solution to resolve my problems with carp? If there is
necessary to show You more informations on my current configuration I
will do everything what I only can.
From experience CARP can behave odly if
Hello,
I have configured two firewalls on IBM x306 servers (they have 512MB
of ram, 3.0 GHz PIV, and 2 gigabit ethernet cards Intel PRO/1000). I
have also added one more network card: D-Link Systems 530TX+ which
is dedicated to pfsync and connected to both firewalls with crossover
Ethernet cable.
