Re: OpenBGPD PF

2006-04-05 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:33:42PM +0059, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:46:54AM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: bgpd has (should have?) enough info from its config to know if it should send an addr_remove (i think this is the one) to pf based upon what addr it is

Re: OpenBGPD PF

2006-01-05 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:18:22AM +0100, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: On Thursday, January 5, 2006, at 01:15:00, jared r r spiegel wrote: - establish session with A and learn about 1.2.3.4/30; 1.2.3.4/30 is written to pftable IX - establish session with B and learn about 1.2.3.4/30;

Re: OpenBGPD PF

2006-01-05 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:46:54AM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:18:22AM +0100, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: On Thursday, January 5, 2006, at 01:15:00, jared r r spiegel wrote: - establish session with A and learn about 1.2.3.4/30; 1.2.3.4/30 is written

Re: OpenBGPD PF

2006-01-04 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:42:44PM +0100, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: What do you think about it? Any ideas what to look for? one - if you are reloading pf ( pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf ), that will clear the table; but that's probably not your issue. two - if you have two peers, A