We've talked to 3 people for feedback on the workflow.
In summary:
- The designs don't match up to the interactions users expect when
selecting a table. They saw more information that what they expected/needed
to, and that lead to confusion
- Users do need to be able to filter through
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Shirley Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:27 AM Dave Page wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Shirley Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rob
>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:53 PM Robert Eckhardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
Shirley,
I have a few questions
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:27 AM Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Shirley Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:53 PM Robert Eckhardt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Shirley,
>>>
>>> I have a few questions.
>>>
>>>1. Why 20. It is a dunbar number and seems smallish but is
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Shirley Wang wrote:
> Hi Rob
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:53 PM Robert Eckhardt
> wrote:
>
>> Shirley,
>>
>> I have a few questions.
>>
>>1. Why 20. It is a dunbar number and seems smallish but is there
>>another reason?
>>
>> The browser fits about 30 is
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Shirley Wang wrote:
> Hi Rob
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:53 PM Robert Eckhardt
> wrote:
>
>> Shirley,
>>
>> I have a few questions.
>>
>>1. Why 20. It is a dunbar number and seems smallish but is there
>>another reason?
>>
>> The browser fits about 30 ish
Hi Rob
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:53 PM Robert Eckhardt
wrote:
> Shirley,
>
> I have a few questions.
>
>1. Why 20. It is a dunbar number and seems smallish but is there
>another reason?
>
> The browser fits about 30 ish items right now on my smallish laptop
screen. The question we asked o
