Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 07/14/2017 01:01 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > > Setting up in server mode by following those docs takes just a few > minutes. > > > > > > Six months ago, I jumped on this with the goal of solving it, partly > > through

Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

On 07/14/2017 11:35 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I don't know how simple you consider uwsgi, but it's certainly well > packaged and maintained in my experience. Now granted that experience is > mostly on debian based platform so it might differ on redhat families, > but it seems likely. I

Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 07/14/2017 08:04 AM, Robert Eckhardt wrote: > > Josh, > > > > I'd be interested in knowing what specific things could be done to make > > you think that the Web version is no longer the 'ugly stepchild'. > > > > If I

Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

On 07/14/2017 01:01 AM, Dave Page wrote: > Setting up in server mode by following those docs takes just a few minutes. > > > Six months ago, I jumped on this with the goal of solving it, partly > through use of linux containers. However, I'm full stop because of the > emphasis on

Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

Josh, I'd be interested in knowing what specific things could be done to make you think that the Web version is no longer the 'ugly stepchild'. If I consider our (Pivotal's) current development process then the most honest thing we could say is that the desktop application is our afterthought.

Re: pgadmin-for-web is going nowhere

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > Installing pgadmin-for-web is painful, poorly documented, and broken. > As a result, it's not considered a real UI by anyone not on this team. > Have you re-read the docs since I told you some time back that I was