Hi Adam.,
and Raphaël.
I spend time to be already considerable on this problem.:-(
However, there is no good development.
As for the root trunk of the problem, gtk Or wxWindows isn't clear, either.
The control of mdi.cpp doesn't go well
event-handler of wxMDIClientWindow can't be caught why.??
From: Adam H. Pendleton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 November 2003
15:10To: Dave PageCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andreas Pflug;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers]
wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
Dave Page wrote:
No. They cannot retroactively change th
Dave Page wrote:
No. They cannot retroactively change the licence on what we already
have.
I was thinking more in terms of future wxWindows snapshots. Are we
going to be stuck with what we currently have, or will we be able to
integrate future wxWindows code?
ahp
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 13:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>
> >- Co
Le Mardi 18 Novembre 2003 14:29, Adam H. Pendleton a écrit :
> This sounds quite ominous considering that we do exactly that:
> distribute a private port of wxWindows. Also, depending on the license
> they choose to distribute wxWindows under, could it cause problems with
> our product (i.e. GPL v
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
- Contributions to the wxWindows project will not be licensed under a license
(such as the "BSD-style" license) that allows private ports to be
distributed.
This sounds quite ominous considering that we do exactly that:
distribute a private port of wxWindows. Also,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2003 09:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> I'm very tired of discussing anything with certain wx people
> being in
Dave Page wrote:
Still absolutely no, there's not a haze of work in committing
my patches, not even commenting on it.
Are you going to bother submitting more now they will probably reject
them out of hand anyway?
I'll still post patches, if I believe they are necessary. The last
mess
Le Mardi 18 Novembre 2003 09:08, Dave Page a écrit :
> For those that don't know, the wx team want all patch submitters to
> sign over copyright etc. on their code - this is at request of Borland
Dear all,
To summarise what Andreas wrote on the wx list (from memory): the individual
contributors
Le Lundi 17 Novembre 2003 21:55, Raphaël Enrici a écrit :
> I think Adam is right regarding dependencies, it's not usefull (and can
> get you to mistake if packages change) to specify all these
> dependencies. FYI Debian's dependencies I use are these (I cut debian
> specific things)
>
> Build-Depe
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 23:23
> To: Adam H. Pendleton
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
>
> >>So are we goin
11 matches
Mail list logo
