Ah...sorry
Windows was severe.:-(
Again patch is this.
It is initialized by the unused.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> Unfortunately this patch does not compile under Windows:
valuntil_patch_r
Description: Binary
Hi Hiroshi,
Unfortunately this patch does not compile under Windows:
Compiling...
pgSet.cpp
C:\Documents and Settings\dpage\My
Documents\CVS\pgadmin3\src\db\pgSet.cpp(205) : error C2668:
'wxDateTime::wxDateTime' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\Documents and Settings\dpage\My
Documents\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Message d'origine
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:17:03 +0100
De: Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copie à: Jean-Michel POURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] SSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> AFAICS the problems you reported isn't related to SSL connections, so
> please use other dedicated threads for this.
Sorry.
> >The problems continue (using yesterday's snapshot):
> >
> > * I get a s
Hi Dave.
Valuntil of pg_user emits ASSERT_MSG when try it in the debug mode.
And, Must partly treat qtString with it.
Please apply it.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
valuntil_patch
Description: Binary data
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to
Hi Andreas,
Message d'origine
>Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:17:03 +0100
>De: Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Copie à: Jean-Michel POURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] SSL connections and Query
>
Devrim,
AFAICS the problems you reported isn't related to SSL connections, so
please use other dedicated threads for this.
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Yep, I'm using the same spec file -- but using the newest wxwindows
packages. Also, I'm using PostgreSQL 7.4 now.
The problems continue (using yeste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
(sorry for the ultra late response)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> Fantastic, we are getting close to explaining the prolem. To my knowledge,
> there is no difference in the RPM spec. Devrim, do you have any idea?
Yep, I'm us
