[pgadmin-hackers] Server Problem

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
OK, obviously these things are sent to try us :-) The new server hosting the cvs and developer has developed what we can only put down to a motherboard fault - basically; - The system clock is running about twice as fast as it should, no matter what I do with ntpd or adjtimex! Bizarrely though th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote: > There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks... #df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 20161172 16482996 2654036 87% /home /dev/sda2

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for

2003-12-17 Thread Andreas Pflug
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :) I keep an archive of all e-mails I get :-) There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks... Should I forward you my spam for archiving too? :-> Regards, Andreas ---(en

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raphaƫl, On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >The latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should > >upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight. > Are you doing some dynamic linking ?

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread blacknoz
Hi devrim, Message d'origine >Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:20:26 +0200 (EET) >De: Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sujet: [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1 > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > >Hi, > >Tha latest sna

[pgadmin-hackers] Build error on FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Latest snapshot (20031212) failed to build on FC1. I'm using the latest wxwindows packages to buil them. Here is the error: === pgConn.o(.text+0x17e4): In function `pgConn::IsSSLconnected()': db/pgConn.cpp:194: undefined referen

[pgadmin-hackers] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The latest wxWindows packages were built for FC1 and uploaded to snake.. err... developer.pgadmin.org :) http://developer.pgadmin.org/snapshots/wxwindows/FC1/20031010.9/ Tha latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should up

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dave, On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code? > Hmm, odd. You could try running the bootstrap script. Ok. I've edited the spec file to run bootstrap script. Package now bui

[pgadmin-hackers] CVS moved

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
Hi all, The cvs has now been moved. The new root is: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/projects The IP address has also changed but will take a liitle while to work it's way around the DNS - it is now 80.176.1.156. I have left the old repository in place for now but made it read only, primarily to pre

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 December 2003 08:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot > of pgadmin3 > > > Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code? Hi Dev

[pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I saw that I haven't built the latest snapshot (20031212) for Fedora Core 1, and began building it. I got an error. + make all make all-recursive make[1]: Entering direct