Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/6/2005 1:41 PM
To: Dave Page
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: pgAgent Scheduler Design
Yes, I'm aware of that issue - and even the current design will have
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/6/2005 1:41 PM
To: Dave Page
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: pgAgent Scheduler Design
> >Yes, I'm aware of that issue - and even the current design will have
> >problems i
Hi Andreas, Dave,
it seems the current snapshots lack two files required for the build:
/cvsroot/pgadmin3/src/slony/include/dlgRepProperty.h
/cvsroot/pgadmin3/src/slony/include/dlgRepTable.h
After I checked them out, I was able to get it running.
Or maybe I did something wrong ?
Cheers,
Raphaël
---
Dave Page wrote:
Yes, I'm aware of that issue - and even the current design will have
problems in that jobs may stil run late.
Better late than never.
I think the correct way to
address this is to grab all due jobs, and spawn a separate thread to
handle each. This should allow jobs to actually star
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 March 2005 23:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: pgAgent Scheduler Design
>
> Sorry, this won't work.
>
> It is mandatory that a "next run" schedu
