Re: [pgadmin-hackers] compilation errors: wrong actions

2005-08-17 Thread Diego Gil
Andreas: after a new checkout, new errors appears : . . . . ./src/include/pgUser.h:18: warning: 'class pgUserFactory' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor ../src/agent/include/pgaJob.h:19: warning: 'class pgaJobFactory' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor ./schema/pgServe

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] compilation errors: wrong actions

2005-08-17 Thread Andreas Pflug
Diego Gil wrote: After receiving Miha's email, I make a fresh svn checkout and get exactly same errors mentioned earlier. I am using Fedora Core 4 linux and wxWidgets-2.6.1. If Miha can compile OK, maybe is something about FC4 compiler ?. I'd guess this is with gcc4. It won't like OnAction

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] compilation errors: wrong actions

2005-08-17 Thread Andreas Pflug
Diego Gil wrote: Hi, I noticed that refresh button and refresh menu item (F5) are connected to delete object action. Delete object button and menu item too, as should be. Calling form->Refresh() instead of form->ExecDrop() did the job, surprise! Regards, Andreas ---(e

[pgadmin-hackers] SVN Commit by andreas: r4409 - in trunk/pgadmin3/src: . dlg include schema

2005-08-17 Thread svn
Author: andreas Date: 2005-08-17 23:08:26 +0100 (Wed, 17 Aug 2005) New Revision: 4409 Modified: trunk/pgadmin3/src/dlg/dlgProperty.cpp trunk/pgadmin3/src/include/dlgClasses.h trunk/pgadmin3/src/include/precomp.h trunk/pgadmin3/src/pgAdmin3.dsp trunk/pgadmin3/src/schema/pgServer.cpp

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] compilation errors: wrong actions

2005-08-17 Thread Diego Gil
After receiving Miha's email, I make a fresh svn checkout and get exactly same errors mentioned earlier. I am using Fedora Core 4 linux and wxWidgets-2.6.1. If Miha can compile OK, maybe is something about FC4 compiler ?. Regards, Diego. El miƩ, 17-08-2005 a las 09:54 +0200, Miha Radej escri

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] compilation errors: wrong actions

2005-08-17 Thread Miha Radej
hi! i successfully configured and compiled pgadmin from a fresh svn checkout today, without the errors diego had mentioned. i would, however, like to confirm his report about the delete-instead-of-refresh bug. it's alive and kicking :) cheers, M Diego Gil wrote: I noticed that refresh butt