Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry for giving you so many testing work... :-/
>
> No problem.
>
>> Here is a new (complete) patch. I don't like at all what I did but it
>> seems to fix your issues.
>
> Well I haven't bee
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for giving you so many testing work... :-/
No problem.
> Here is a new (complete) patch. I don't like at all what I did but it
> seems to fix your issues.
Well I haven't been able to test it yet (I'm currentl
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this will be acceptable by the core team, I am going to experiment with
> an ordering mechanism just like the one in the GQD. It will have to be in
> such way that we can reuse it in other places too.
I think the fir
> To use as a template? That's not really functionality for the
> straightforward properties dialogue though.
After some experimenting I have to admit, adding a new tab to the type
editor will not do. I have to come up with a better solution then.
> > 2) Like the GQD add column ordering to the
