Most runtime bugs are now fixed. The only two that I know of at the
moment (although I just built wx SVN in the last two hours) is the
distortion of AUI widgets and the disappearance of our splashscreen,
which I didn't see against 2.9.1 . Many of the bugs are fixed by just
building against wxWidget
Seemingly many of those wxString::Printf( ) assertion failures that I
now see are actually bugs in wx 2.9.1 . I'm now working with wxWidgets
SVN head, and suggest that anyone that wants to help with or recreate
my work do the same. As we all know, 2.9/3.0 support isn't something
of much practical u
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:19, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Forgive me if I'm being dense... but doesn't this error indicate that
>> it *isn't* just that?
>
> No. Nikhil said (and the patch matches) that EDBAS, in PG mode or
> normal/Oracle mode, ha
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm being dense... but doesn't this error indicate that
> it *isn't* just that?
No. Nikhil said (and the patch matches) that EDBAS, in PG mode or
normal/Oracle mode, has the problem. On PostgreSQL, the problem
doesn't exist (
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 22:09, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>
>>>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:10, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG data
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
>> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode
> for
> me. I too was puzz
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01, Dave Page wrote:
> On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>>
>>>
Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS
>>
On 2/8/11, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS
>>> specific.
>>>
>>
>> Just checked. The version checker
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS specific.
>>
>
> Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number and
> also
11 matches
Mail list logo
