Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: Using wxDatePickerCtrl instead of wxCalendarBox

2011-05-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On ubuntu 10.04 and some of the linux flavors, the wxCalendarBox is not at all usable. Sometimes, it even does not render the calendar properly on clicking the pop up button, and sometimes, it does not allow to click on the calendar. As per my conversation with Dave, he was able to reproduce the s

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: Using wxDatePickerCtrl instead of wxCalendarBox

2011-05-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 05/27/2011 11:17 PM, Ashesh Vashi a écrit : > Hi Dave, > > For some reason, the wxCalendarBox control was not working on linux (i.e. > Ubuntu). > I found that - wxWidgets has already provided a class for that. > (wxDatePickerCtrl). > > http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxdatepickerctrl.html

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Timwi wrote: > > Hahaha... “simple instructions” :-D. All it says is: > > “Under Windows, we recommend using TortoiseGIT, which is free software.” > > And that’s it. Nice “simple instructions” there. We're not reproducing the helpfile for another GUI app. We do h

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: Using wxDatePickerCtrl instead of wxCalendarBox

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Very sexy on Windows 7. 2011/5/27 Ashesh Vashi > Hi Dave, > > For some reason, the wxCalendarBox control was not working on linux (i.e. > Ubuntu). > I found that - wxWidgets has already provided a class for that. > (wxDatePickerCtrl). > > http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxdatepickerctrl.html

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 27/05/2011 20:23, Dave Page wrote: >> >> I do use github. It was more the fact that you seem to consider source >> control to be a hinderance and something to work around rather than an >> essential part of a sound development process. > > It’s a

[pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: Using wxDatePickerCtrl instead of wxCalendarBox

2011-05-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Hi Dave, For some reason, the wxCalendarBox control was not working on linux (i.e. Ubuntu). I found that - wxWidgets has already provided a class for that. (wxDatePickerCtrl). http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxdatepickerctrl.html As per our conversation, I have modified the code to use the w

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] FWD Handler with 9.0

2011-05-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 05/27/2011 10:00 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic a écrit : > With 1.14 Beta 1 when connecting to 9.0 and enabling FWD in browser a error > message appears: Column fwdhandler not found or similar. > My fault. I applied your patch, works great. Thanks a lot. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Disabling handler in fdw with pgsql < 9.1

2011-05-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Disabling handler in fdw with pgsql < 9.1 Fix error message because of missing pg_foreign_data_wrapper.fdwhandler column with PostgresSQL < 9.1. Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=05521bb8a89aee5dccf3f3165d87e744e41bff02 Author: Ja

[pgadmin-hackers] FWD Handler with 9.0

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
With 1.14 Beta 1 when connecting to 9.0 and enabling FWD in browser a error message appears: Column fwdhandler not found or similar. 0001-Fix-error-message-because-of-missing-pg_foreign_data.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected])

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 27/05/2011 19:35, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Wow. Just wow. > > Was the idea of using github so ingenious that it compromised your ability > to formulate meaningful, coherent sentences? :) I do use github. It was more the fact that you seem to consid

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Timwi
On 27/05/2011 19:35, Dave Page wrote: Wow. Just wow. Was the idea of using github so ingenious that it compromised your ability to formulate meaningful, coherent sentences? :) -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Jasmin Dizdarevic
Hi, the problem is the command-line definition for png2c in pgadmin3.props. when line 14 looks like that, the build works. "$(SolutionDir)xtra\png2c\$(Configuration)\png2c.exe" [AllOptions] [AdditionalOptions] "%(FullPath)" "%(FullPath)c" there is also a build-wxmsw attached that works with vs

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 27/05/2011 16:47, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Using an extremely popular source control system is a hoop to jump >> through? > > Yes. Mostly because it is crap and unusable (its popularity has no effect on > that), but also because even the best source

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Freezing on Windows does weird things.

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
Freezing on Windows does weird things. Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3f1f2e5b9af7ebd86563ab523b356e3e5165bb81 Modified Files -- pgadmin/ctl/ctlSQLBox.cpp |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 27/05/2011 16:16, Dave Page wrote: >>> >>> All the VS 2010 developers are not much of a gain? If you say so... >> >> VS 2010 users are more than capable of using 2008 as well I imagine. > > I tried to offer my help with this project. I already had

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 05/27/2011 05:32 PM, Timwi a écrit : > On 27/05/2011 16:16, Dave Page wrote: >>> All the VS 2010 developers are not much of a gain? If you say so... >> >> VS 2010 users are more than capable of using 2008 as well I imagine. > > I tried to offer my help with this project. I already had to jump >

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin III commit: Avoid recursing through the OnPaint handler. Only s

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
Avoid recursing through the OnPaint handler. Only seems to affect the Mac, but still nasty. Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=467e0d9072f15bb1d45a1374b5f713287d8d2a7c Modified Files -- pgadmin/ctl/ctlSQLBox.cpp |3

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Timwi
On 27/05/2011 16:16, Dave Page wrote: All the VS 2010 developers are not much of a gain? If you say so... VS 2010 users are more than capable of using 2008 as well I imagine. I tried to offer my help with this project. I already had to jump through two hoops (one to download git and get the

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Adam Scott
I think users care about the features in pgadmin more than what compiler built it. But, if you want to try to get it to build and run, earlier I was able to get it to build. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgadmin-hackers/2011-04/msg00155.php But when launching it seg faulted if I recall correctl

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 27/05/2011 15:00, Dave Page wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Timwi  wrote: >>> >>> On 26/05/2011 01:09, Dave Page wrote: Try VC++ 2008. We haven't yet updated to 2010. >>> >>> So when are you going to update? This is not ver

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Timwi
On 27/05/2011 15:00, Dave Page wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Timwi wrote: On 26/05/2011 01:09, Dave Page wrote: Try VC++ 2008. We haven't yet updated to 2010. So when are you going to update? This is not very helpful. Not at least until we start working on the next release. Upgr

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Timwi wrote: > On 26/05/2011 01:09, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Try VC++ 2008. We haven't yet updated to 2010. > > So when are you going to update? This is not very helpful. Not at least until we start working on the next release. Upgrading is not trivial, as it affect

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem trying to compile PgAdmin

2011-05-27 Thread Timwi
On 26/05/2011 01:09, Dave Page wrote: Try VC++ 2008. We haven't yet updated to 2010. So when are you going to update? This is not very helpful. -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pga

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Vinicius Santos wrote: > Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented >> >> in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not >> sure how feasible that is though... >> > I thought just in pgObject. > > I'll write and tell

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 05/27/2011 02:08 PM, Vinicius Santos a écrit : > Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented > >> in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not >> sure how feasible that is though... >> >> I thought just in pgObject. > > I'll write and tell me wh

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Vinicius Santos
Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be implemented > in an object type independent way - ie. in pgObject for example. Not > sure how feasible that is though... > > I thought just in pgObject. I'll write and tell me what you think. Should I send this afternoon (afternoon for me,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Vinicius Santos wrote: >> >> What I'd really like to see is an option which enables on-selection >> refreshing for all object types. >> > > OK. > > I will develop it , and send a patch for you to analyze. Cool, thanks :-). Ideally, something like this should be i

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Vinicius Santos
> > > What I'd really like to see is an option which enables on-selection > refreshing for all object types. > > OK. I will develop it , and send a patch for you to analyze. Thanks.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Update functions and trigger functions by clicking

2011-05-27 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Vinicius Santos wrote: > Hello, > > I implemented an option to update functions and trigger functions, by > clicking on them in the treeview. > > This avoids problems when someone changes the function, and I get the old > version and then overwrite it, without