Hi Dave,
>
> This change is unrelated to porting to pure C++, and needs to be
> discussed and (if acceptable) implemented as a separate patch. I'm not
> convinced it's an appropriate change at all - I certainly work with
> customer who do not use a connection pooler for various reasons, and
> rely
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Linreg wrote:
> **
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
>
>
> > > - You seem to have hard-coded the exit code from Windows batch job
>
> > >
>
> > > steps to 1. Why?
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > => i changed back to git-head version. i believe it come from old 3.3.0
>
> > > sour
