On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Mickael Deloison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Artistic License only seems fine and simple, so I am going to go for it.
> About psql integration, I have never thought about it. But pgScript is
> written in C++ (with objects and RTTI) and I think if its features
>
2008/4/25 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, I chatted with Dave about this a couple of days ago, and if you
> > like this, I think that's the best. Or I think you can license the
> > whole thing as BSD, tha
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I chatted with Dave about this a couple of days ago, and if you
> like this, I think that's the best. Or I think you can license the
> whole thing as BSD, that will have no conflict at all with pgadmin -
> correct
Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From
> > what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under
> > the Artistic License and freely available. Correct?
>
> Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licen
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From
> what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under
> the Artistic License and freely available. Correct?
Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licence in the
same way as GPL - use
Hi,
I just posted about the pgScript project. As I said it is going to be
both available through the SQL query tool of pgAdmin and as a
standalone application. Therefore, to make the integration into
pgAdmin easier, I would like to reuse some pgAdmin code (connection
part) in the standalone packag
