Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC1 did not hit website

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:33 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > > pgadmin.org still mentions about beta 4, it needs an update for RC1. > > > > > > > Yes. We always 'officially' release after PostgreSQL. > > For a

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC1 did not hit website

Hi Dave, On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:33 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > pgadmin.org still mentions about beta 4, it needs an update for RC1. > > > > Yes. We always 'officially' release after PostgreSQL. For a moment I thought it was Friday. Sorry :) Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ EnterpriseDB:

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RC1 did not hit website

2016-09-01 11:31 GMT+01:00 Devrim Gündüz : > > Hi, > > pgadmin.org still mentions about beta 4, it needs an update for RC1. > Yes. We always 'officially' release after PostgreSQL. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK:

[pgadmin-hackers] RC1 did not hit website

Hi, pgadmin.org still mentions about beta 4, it needs an update for RC1. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR signature.asc Description: This is a digitally