Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Refresh Servers bug

2005-10-18 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 October 2005 09:53 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Refresh Servers bug > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Refresh Servers bug

2005-10-18 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 10/17/2005 5:52 PM To: Dave Page Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Refresh Servers bug Hm, that shouldn't refresh at all (CanRefresh() returning false), makes no sense. new pgS

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Refresh Servers bug

2005-10-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 10/17/2005 5:52 PM To: Dave Page Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Refresh Servers bug > Hm, that shouldn't refresh at all (CanRefresh() returning false), makes > no sense. new pgServerCollection

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Refresh Servers bug

2005-10-17 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: Hi Andreas, Noticed a bug today which I guess comes from your factory related refactorisation. In a nutshell, refreshing the top level servers node drops all registered servers (except the detected local servers on Windows). Hm, that shouldn't refresh at all (CanRefresh() ret

[pgadmin-hackers] Refresh Servers bug

2005-10-17 Thread Dave Page
Hi Andreas, Noticed a bug today which I guess comes from your factory related refactorisation. In a nutshell, refreshing the top level servers node drops all registered servers (except the detected local servers on Windows). Can you take a look please? Regards, Dave ---