Chris Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Dave Page") writes:
>>> --- Original Message ---
>>> From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: 17/11/07, 16:38:10
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Dave Page") writes:
>> --- Original Message ---
>> From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: 17/11/07, 16:38:10
>> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support fo
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 17/11/07, 16:38:10
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Support for older servers
>
> Maybe it's too hard to test a feature in
Dave Page wrote:
> Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
> next major version of pgAdmin?
>
JOOC, is there any specific reason for that? The 7.x code paths are
already there, the backend didn't break the compatibility yet, ...
Maybe it's too hard to test a featur
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the
next major version of pgAdmin?
Thoughts?
/D
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your jo
