On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 15:30, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 17/06/2010 14:52, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge
>> wrote:
>>> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander
wrote:
> Hi!
>
Le 17/06/2010 14:52, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander
>>> wrote:
Hi!
In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecall
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is
>>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds
Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is
>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase
>> transactions. That's misleading, I've had question
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is
> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase
> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular
> transactions don't show up
Hi!
In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is
labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase
transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular
transactions don't show up there.
I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transaction
