Hi Dave.
It is repaired in this.:-)
Please Apply it.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
> From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (snip)
> >I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger
> to a table
> >that already had one. When the new node was added to the
> treeview, it
> >took the nam
; Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger addition wierdness
>
>
> Hi Dave.
>
> The humor of today's cvs is ill.:-)
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (snip)
> > Hmm, shouldn't be a bug, the
003 20:13
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger addition wierdness
>
>
> Hi Dave.
>
> It is repaired in this.:-)
> Please Apply it.
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> > From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Dave.
The humor of today's cvs is ill.:-)
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(snip)
> Hmm, shouldn't be a bug, the exterminator said he got all of those last
> week...
>
> I'll have to have a play. Meanwhile, I'm hacking the Query Builder about
> at the moment so don
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 September 2003 00:04
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger addition wierdness
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >Hi Andreas,
> &
Dave Page wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger to a table
that already had one. When the new node was added to the treeview, it
took the name of the existing trigger, not the new one. A refresh
cleared it up.
I had a quick look at the code but couldn't s
Hi Andreas,
I was working in a db earlier today, and added a new trigger to a table
that already had one. When the new node was added to the treeview, it
took the name of the existing trigger, not the new one. A refresh
cleared it up.
I had a quick look at the code but couldn't see anything obvio
