[pgadmin-hackers] Bug Report: PgUp/PgDn in Query results not working

2017-05-29 Thread Richard Tallent
Hi, I just upgraded to pgAdmin 4 v.1.5 on OS X 10.11.6. I opened a table (view all rows), and the page up/down buttons don’t work when the query results grid is in focus. Also, when the query is refreshed, the columns lose their custom widths. Since the default widths are very wide for short t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-25 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2014-02-26 13:27 GMT+09:00 Ashesh Vashi : > Done. > Checked-in in the master and REL-1_18_0_PATCHES branch. > > Many thanks. If someone can provide a Windows build, I can verify it in the environment where the issue occurred. Regards Ian Barwick > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Ashesh Vash

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-25 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Done. Checked-in in the master and REL-1_18_0_PATCHES branch. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick > wrote: > >> Just wondering - is anything happening with this patch? >> > I was waiting for other hackers for their respon

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-25 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > Just wondering - is anything happening with this patch? > I was waiting for other hackers for their response. I will check-in the patch as nobody objected. Thanks for the reminder though. > > Regards > > Ian Barwick > > 2014-02-05 19

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-25 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
Just wondering - is anything happening with this patch? Regards Ian Barwick 2014-02-05 19:02 GMT+09:00 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > Thanks for the update . > > Regards > > Ian Barwick > > > 2014-02-05 Ashesh Vashi : > > Dave, >> >> The patch, sent by Ian Lawrence, looks good me. >> I also found som

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-05 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
Thanks for the update . Regards Ian Barwick 2014-02-05 Ashesh Vashi : > Dave, > > The patch, sent by Ian Lawrence, looks good me. > I also found some other places, where the similar changes were required > (specially in debugger code). > I've attached the combined patch (debugger changes and I

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-02-05 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Dave, The patch, sent by Ian Lawrence, looks good me. I also found some other places, where the similar changes were required (specially in debugger code). I've attached the combined patch (debugger changes and Ian's patch). If nobody has any objection, I will check-in the patch on both REL-1_18_

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-01-10 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2014/1/10 Ashesh Vashi > Sorry - it was missed due to busy schedule. > I will take a look at it. > > Thanks for the reminder. > No worries, thanks for replying so quickly. Regards Ian Barwick > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick > wrote: > >> 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence B

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-01-10 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Sorry - it was missed due to busy schedule. I will take a look at it. Thanks for the reminder. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > > 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > > > >>> > >>> BTW other objects (tables, schemas etc.) with OID

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2014-01-10 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > >>> >>> BTW other objects (tables, schemas etc.) with OIDs greater than 256^4/2 - 1 >>> don't seem to be affected by this. >> >> It's been a while since I've looked at the pgAdmin source, but some wild >> grepping shows that in

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2013-11-22 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : >> >> BTW other objects (tables, schemas etc.) with OIDs greater than 256^4/2 - 1 >> don't seem to be affected by this. > > It's been a while since I've looked at the pgAdmin source, but some wild > grepping shows that in: > > pgadmin/schema/pgRole.cpp > > the r

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2013-11-21 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick : > > 2013/11/22 Ashesh Vashi >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On Windows, if a user role's OID exceeds 256^4/2 - 1 (aka 2147483647), >>> the OID is displayed as 2147483647 and additional information for that

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2013-11-21 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
2013/11/22 Ashesh Vashi > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Windows, if a user role's OID exceeds 256^4/2 - 1 (aka 2147483647), >> the OID is displayed as 2147483647 and additional information for that >> object >> (e.g. ACL information) is not disp

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2013-11-21 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > Hi > > On Windows, if a user role's OID exceeds 256^4/2 - 1 (aka 2147483647), > the OID is displayed as 2147483647 and additional information for that > object > (e.g. ACL information) is not displayed. > > We have verified this happe

[pgadmin-hackers] Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?)

2013-11-21 Thread Ian Lawrence Barwick
Hi On Windows, if a user role's OID exceeds 256^4/2 - 1 (aka 2147483647), the OID is displayed as 2147483647 and additional information for that object (e.g. ACL information) is not displayed. We have verified this happens with pgAdmin3 1.16.0 on Windows 7 and 1.18.1 on Windows 2012 server. It do

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report on Red Hat Bugzilla #877011

2012-11-15 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 14:39 +, Dave Page wrote: > > Please try 1.16.0. 1.14.0 is quite old, and there have been tons of > bug fixes since that minor version, as well as the major increment > since then. Hmm, I just noticed that I pushed 1.16 to f17 already. Let me ask him to update. Th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report on Red Hat Bugzilla #877011

2012-11-15 Thread Dave Page
Hi Please try 1.16.0. 1.14.0 is quite old, and there have been tons of bug fixes since that minor version, as well as the major increment since then. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > > Hi, > > This was just reported, regarding a SIGSEGV: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

[pgadmin-hackers] Bug report on Red Hat Bugzilla #877011

2012-11-15 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, This was just reported, regarding a SIGSEGV: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877011 Can someone please look at the backtrace given there? Thanks! Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant,

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report from Fedora: #542553

2009-12-01 Thread Dave Page
2009/12/1 Devrim GÜNDÜZ : > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:00 +, Dave Page wrote: >> >> With no description (that I can see) of what the user was doing >> exactly, it's hard to suggest anything. > > For the records, here is what user did: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542553#c4 > >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report from Fedora: #542553

2009-12-01 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:00 +, Dave Page wrote: > > With no description (that I can see) of what the user was doing > exactly, it's hard to suggest anything. For the records, here is what user did: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542553#c4 Another bug report was just filed: htt

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug report from Fedora: #542553

2009-11-30 Thread Dave Page
2009/11/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ : > Hi, > > This was filed today against Fedora 12: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542553 With no description (that I can see) of what the user was doing exactly, it's hard to suggest anything. For example I fixed a bug a couple of days ago that might have

[pgadmin-hackers] Bug report from Fedora: #542553

2009-11-30 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, This was filed today against Fedora 12: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542553 Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/d

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-17 Thread Dave Page
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Quan Zongliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Attachment is the most important debug info. I forgot it. > > From it, I know how to modify source. Ahh, I got it. The bug doesn't occur unless you manually specify the primary key value (which I normally leave up to th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-15 Thread Quan Zongliang
> > That seems to work fine in the editor on PG 8.3.4 (really must upgrade > that!) using pgAdmin 1.8.4 and SVN trunk on OS X. What server version > and OS are you using? Can anyone else reproduce this? I tested it in CentOS 5.2 and Windows XP, both got error. The attachment is snapshot in KDE.

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-14 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Quan Zongliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Thanks... but, now I come to test it, I cannot reproduce the problem. >> Were you testing with SVN trunk, or a release version of pgAdmin? > > I had tested at release 1.8.4 and 1.9.0-dev. > The target column is null

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-14 Thread Quan Zongliang
> > Thanks... but, now I come to test it, I cannot reproduce the problem. > Were you testing with SVN trunk, or a release version of pgAdmin? I had tested at release 1.8.4 and 1.9.0-dev. The target column is nullable, input some value in other columns and press Enter key. The error will be throw

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-14 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Quan Zongliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Are you in a position to fix it? Your last patch was good, and we >> always welcome new hackers :-) > > Ok, fixed. Thanks... but, now I come to test it, I cannot reproduce the problem. Were you testing with SVN trunk

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-13 Thread Quan Zongliang
> > Are you in a position to fix it? Your last patch was good, and we > always welcome new hackers :-) Ok, fixed. --- Quan Zongliang [EMAIL PROTECTED] CIT Japan: http://www.cit.co.jp pgSet_7497.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgadmin-ha

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-13 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Quan Zongliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, my mistake. > > This error is caused by double quotation mark, not comma. Are you in a position to fix it? Your last patch was good, and we always welcome new hackers :-) -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://ww

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-12 Thread Quan Zongliang
Sorry, my mistake. This error is caused by double quotation mark, not comma. > When column name has commas, using the data grid to insert row will > causes error. > For test, I defined column named "quoted col ,""' name". > A printscreen in attachment. --

[pgadmin-hackers] bug report

2008-11-12 Thread Quan Zongliang
hi When column name has commas, using the data grid to insert row will causes error. For test, I defined column named "quoted col ,""' name". A printscreen in attachment. By the way: I had implemented TODO Item: - Add support for DESC/NULLS FIRST/NULLS LAST when creating indexes. It seems work

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Bug Report

2007-04-04 Thread Dave Page
Zongliang, Quan wrote: > In pgServer.cpp, Line 752: > > if (executed) > { > password = newVal; > StorePassword(); > --->return false; > } > else > return false; > > Although the passwd had been changed successfully with "Change Password" > dialog. "The

[pgadmin-hackers] Bug Report

2007-04-04 Thread Zongliang, Quan
In pgServer.cpp, Line 752: if (executed) { password = newVal; StorePassword(); --->return false; } else return false; Although the passwd had been changed successfully with "Change Password" dialog. "The password could not be changed!" message always po

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-22 Thread Dave Page
Quan Zongliang wrote: > Thanks, It's OK. Great :-) > Now, in tips.txt: > The answer to the question of Life, the Universe and Everything is 42. > This statement is too difficult to translate it. > What's meaning ? > Help me, please. :-) It's a joke entry - leave it out if it doesn't make s

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Dave Page
> --- Original Message --- > From: Quan Zongliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 21/03/07, 13:11:30 > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips > > Now it is GB2312 > > How to convert it? I believe th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Quan Zongliang
Now it is GB2312 How to convert it? -- 权 宗亮(Quan Zongliang) [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Dave Page
Quan Zongliang wrote: > Encoding is zh_CN. Thats a language, not an encoding. The encoding might be UTF-8, Ascii, EUC_CN etc. Regards, Dave ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgre

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Quan Zongliang
Encoding is zh_CN. -- 权 宗亮(Quan Zongliang) [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] tips.txt Description: Binary data ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Dave Page
Quan Zongliang wrote: hi! I am translating tips.txt to Chinese-simplified. It seems in frmHint.cpp has a bug. When read multibyte tips file, always display "Failed to convert file ... to Unicode". It is throwed at line 135 in wxWidgets\src\common\textfile.cpp. After line 129: const wxString s

[pgadmin-hackers] bug report about tips

2007-03-21 Thread Quan Zongliang
hi! I am translating tips.txt to Chinese-simplified. It seems in frmHint.cpp has a bug. When read multibyte tips file, always display "Failed to convert file ... to Unicode". It is throwed at line 135 in wxWidgets\src\common\textfile.cpp. After line 129: const wxString str(buf, conv, bufPos); i