Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Andreas Pflug
Jean-Michel POURE wrote: On Friday 13 June 2003 10:42, Dave Page wrote: Fixes Win32 but Linux is broken again. Incidently, snake has gcc 3.2.2, not 3.3. This does not seem to be a gcc 3.2/3.3 issue. On both RedHat 9 (gcc 3.2) and SuSE 8.2 (gcc 3.3), the error is the same: This is a re

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
On Friday 13 June 2003 10:42, Dave Page wrote: > Fixes Win32 but Linux is broken again. Incidently, snake has gcc 3.2.2, > not 3.3. This does not seem to be a gcc 3.2/3.3 issue. On both RedHat 9 (gcc 3.2) and SuSE 8.2 (gcc 3.3), the error is the same: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Page > Sent: 13 June 2003 09:34 > To: Andreas Pflug; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Michel POURE > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance > > > > Hmm, see what you mean. In my bleary-eyed attempt to fix it I > misre

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 June 2003 09:09 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Michel POURE > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance > > > Dave Page wrote: > > This fix breaks win32 c

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
LD/pgadmin3-20030613' make: *** [all] Erreur 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22060 (%build) Cheers, Jean-Michel > Dave Page wrote: > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: 12 June 2003 16:50 >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 June 2003 16:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Adam Pendleton Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance On Thursday 12 June 2003 17:09, you wrote: Can you CVS update please? I fixed

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-13 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Adam Pendleton > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance > > > On Thursday 12 June 2003 17:09, you wrote: > > C

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-12 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
On Thursday 12 June 2003 17:09, you wrote: > Can you CVS update please? I fixed that yesterday (unless someone > un-fixed it again). This is an error output from today. It only occurs under SuSE 82. Maybe we should wait for Adam patch review and then I will try again to compile under SuSE. Ada

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-12 Thread Dave Page
Can you CVS update please? I fixed that yesterday (unless someone un-fixed it again). Regards, Dave. > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2003 15:27 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 complian

[pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance

2003-06-12 Thread Jean-Michel POURE
Dear all, SuSE 82 comes with gcc 3.3 installed by defaut, which is much strict then gcc 3.2. For example, here is a compilation error: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/pgsql -I/space/pgadmin/wxGTK/install/lib/wx/include/gtk2ud-2.5 -I/space/pgadmin/wxGTK/install/include -D__