Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-25 Thread Dave Page
Hi Frank, I found a few minutes - this is now committed with menu options etc. A useful addition - thanks. Regards, Dave. > -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 March 2003 16:21 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: RE

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-25 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 March 2003 08:38 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- &g

RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-25 Thread frank_lupo
> > > > -Original Message- > > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 24 March 2003 16:21 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > > Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > > > >>6) Th

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-24 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 March 2003 16:21 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > >>6) The patch doesn't include updates to frmMain and clsCon

RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-24 Thread frank_lupo
>>1) It should include all object types - aggregates, casts, types etc should be >>handled as well. add all object type no database,schema,language,sequence >>2) The new objects are not added to the treeview. ok >>3) User variables are not cloned with the user. Ok >>4) Numeric columns in tables

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-21 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 March 2003 10:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > > > > > What you say to make? > Not to create

RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-21 Thread frank_lupo
> > > > -Original Message- > > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 21 March 2003 10:02 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > > > > > &g

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-21 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 March 2003 10:02 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database > > > > 5) 'System' indexes (such a created by Primary Key

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-21 Thread frank_lupo
> 5) 'System' indexes (such a created by Primary Key or Unique > constraints) will also be manually recreated. I do not understand. You can explain to me better? Tanks Bye !! Frank Lupo (Wolf) !! /\_ _/\ \ o o / --ooo-ooo--- -- Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: h

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Clone object database

2003-03-18 Thread Dave Page
Hi Frank, Sorry for the delay in looking at this, I've been swamped! A few immediately obvious problems with this patch I'm afraid: 1) It should include all object types - aggregates, casts, types etc should be handled as well. 2) The new objects are not added to the treeview. 3) User variable

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] clone object database

2003-03-17 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: frank_lupo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 March 2003 17:01 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] clone object database > > > There are problems for the clone object database? Dunno yet. I haven't had time to sit down and get a good look