Re: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp

2005-01-12 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 January 2005 09:27 > To: Dave Page > Cc: P3 Consulting; pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp > > Dave Page wrote: > > > Did you get a chanc

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp

2005-01-12 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: Did you get a chance to look at this? It seems to me that the quick and dirty solution is to wrap the index->iSetxxx calls in an 'if (index)', however I'm not entirely convinced that is safe given that it's possible to return a null index pointer to the caller (which without signif

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp

2005-01-12 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P3 > Consulting > Sent: 08 January 2005 10:28 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp > > switch (indexes->GetVal(wxT("contype"))[0U]) > { >