Magnus Hagander wrote:
Sounds like distri bloating, for no benefit.
Best would be if this manifest stuff could be omitted totally; we
probably could link to the old msvcrt then.
The bloat is only about 1.5Mb which isn't too bad, but having
Or you can just link statically and then only pul
> > Sounds like distri bloating, for no benefit.
> >
> > Best would be if this manifest stuff could be omitted totally; we
> > probably could link to the old msvcrt then.
>
> The bloat is only about 1.5Mb which isn't too bad, but having
Or you can just link statically and then only pull in the
> >>>Now that Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition is free from
> Microsoft, is
> >>>there any reason not to upgrade the VC project files to the latest
> >>>version and drop VC++6 support?
> >>
> >>I think VC++6 environment is required until it stops
> supporting W2K.
> >
> >
> > Why?
>
> Appare
> > Also, can Visual Studio 6 and the 2005 Express Editions go
> exist on a
> > computer?
>
> I have Visual Studio 6, 2003 and 2005 installed here with no
> problems. I would assume that Express can coexist as well
> (though probably not with my 2K5 Team Edition).
I beleive it will coexist fi
Dave Page wrote:
The bloat is only about 1.5Mb which isn't too bad, but having just
watched literally thousands of warnings go past when compiling wxWidgets
about all sorts of stuff like strdup being deprecated, I really can't be
bothered to carry on. Perhaps when wx is cleaned up...
Accord
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 20:38
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Hiroshi Saito; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
>
> >
Dave Page wrote:
I'm not so sure it's a problem - from Visual Studio's redist.txt:
For your convenience, we have provided the following folders for use
when redistributing VC++ runtime files. Subject to the license terms for
the software, you may redistribute the folder (unmodified) in the
a
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 17:37
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Hiroshi Saito; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
>
> > Ah, now that I didn't know. So, y
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2006 17:07
To: Dave Page
Cc: Hiroshi Saito; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
Why?
Apparently, VC2005 links mandatorily/unavoidable to
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 17:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Hiroshi Saito; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
>
> > Why?
>
> Apparently, VC2005
> Hirohi Saito wrote:
> > Ahhh, even not only environment but my name will be unstable recently.:-)
>
> We all know that Japan's ground may be shakey frmo time to itme.
> Apparently, letters can be affected too.
Uga, I have many pen names.:-)
Absolute.
Hiroshi Saito
---
Hirohi Saito wrote:
I think VC++6 environment is required until it stops supporting W2K.
Why?
It has difficulty in offer by the MSVCRT problem.
Probably, In the case of supply of a binary.
There's a typo in your email name BTW: Hirodhi Saito
Ahhh, even not only environment but my name
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hirodhi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2006 16:36
To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
Now that Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition is free from Microsoft, is
there any
> > I think VC++6 environment is required until it stops supporting W2K.
>
> Why?
It has difficulty in offer by the MSVCRT problem.
Probably, In the case of supply of a binary.
> There's a typo in your email name BTW: Hirodhi Saito
Ahhh, even not only environment but my name will be unstable re
> -Original Message-
> From: Hirodhi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 16:36
> To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
>
> > Now that Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition is free from Micr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Edward Di Geronimo Jr.
> Sent: 21 April 2006 16:31
> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Visual C++ 2005
>
> Quoting Dave Page :
>
> Now that Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition is free from Microsoft, is
> there any reason not to upgrade the VC project files to the latest
> version and drop VC++6 support?
I think VC++6 environment is required until it stops supporting W2K.
However, VS2005Express will be great. Therefore, it is
Quoting Dave Page :
Now that Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition is free from Microsoft, is
there any reason not to upgrade the VC project files to the latest
version and drop VC++6 support?
I haven't looked into anything newer than VC++, so I don't know much
about it. What do we gain by upgradi
18 matches
Mail list logo
