(%build)
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2003 16:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Adam Pendleton
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance
On Thursday 12 June 2003 17:09, you wrote:
Can
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 09:09
To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Michel POURE
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance
Dave Page wrote:
This fix breaks win32 compilation, and I really don't know
what
-Original Message-
From: Dave Page
Sent: 13 June 2003 09:34
To: Andreas Pflug; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Michel POURE
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance
Hmm, see what you mean. In my bleary-eyed attempt to fix it I
misread the code and managed to fix it for me
On Friday 13 June 2003 10:42, Dave Page wrote:
Fixes Win32 but Linux is broken again. Incidently, snake has gcc 3.2.2,
not 3.3.
This does not seem to be a gcc 3.2/3.3 issue. On both RedHat 9 (gcc 3.2) and
SuSE 8.2 (gcc 3.3), the error is the same:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
On Friday 13 June 2003 10:42, Dave Page wrote:
Fixes Win32 but Linux is broken again. Incidently, snake has gcc 3.2.2,
not 3.3.
This does not seem to be a gcc 3.2/3.3 issue. On both RedHat 9 (gcc 3.2) and
SuSE 8.2 (gcc 3.3), the error is the same:
This is a
Can you CVS update please? I fixed that yesterday (unless someone
un-fixed it again).
Regards, Dave.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2003 15:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] gcc3.3 compliance
Dear all,
On Thursday 12 June 2003 17:09, you wrote:
Can you CVS update please? I fixed that yesterday (unless someone
un-fixed it again).
This is an error output from today. It only occurs under SuSE 82. Maybe we
should wait for Adam patch review and then I will try again to compile under
SuSE.
