Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 09:17, Dave Page a écrit :
> BTW, have you been following the discussion on pgsql-hackers about the
> ongoing pl/pgSQL drop column code?
Yes, sounds interesting but the code will probably be very close to ours.
But, didn't we say no PL/pgSQL in our previous discussion
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:27, Dave Page a écrit :
> I just noticed in your update you forgot to alter the pgView.SQL function
> entry iLogEvent call to log the new parameters; It should look like:
>
> Public Property Get SQL(Optional PseudoAlter As Boolean) As String
> On Error GoTo Err_Handl
Hi Dave,
Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me understand why?
This is not a question of .dll as I recompiled everything a restarted the
computer.
> 1) Rollback in case of failure is not yet enabled (or tested?)
The code is commented. I will uncomment after 2) is fixes.
>
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit :
> No, it's user defined because the user/sysadmin adds it himself.
plpgsql_call_handler is a sys object added by user input.
It does not necassary mean it is a user object.. Users may think it is
allowed to drop this object ***because*** it
Hi Dave,
I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list.
Shouldn't it be part of system objects?
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
Dear Dave,
CREATE TRIGGER "tg_term_source_iu" BEFORE DELETEINSERT OR UPDATE ON
"translationforge_term_source" FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
tg_term_source_iu();
The properties of the trigger appear to be OK. Only the SQL definition does
not display well. I tried to understand the bug but di
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit :
> If there's anything I've missed, please let me
> know.
IMHO, PostgreSQL installer under Cygwin is ***essential***. This is the next
thing after table alter column. By the way, when do you think you will be
ablt to fix view definition, jus
> A fine upgrade to an already good product. It still has exactly the right
features for DB admin, and no extraneous fluff.
Thanks. Dave, Chris likes your pgAdmin2 very much.
> Is there an option that would simulate the old Security Window from PgAdmin
(1) ? I found the security wizard, but it
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 09:37
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ALTER VIEW
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:27, Dave Page a écrit :
> > I just noticed in your update you forgot to alter
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:57
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:51, Dave Page a écrit :
> > No, it's user defined beca
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 13:23
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me
> understand why?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 15:55
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Changes committed
>
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> Changes are commited to CVS : bugfix, view OID retrieval,
> view rollback.
>
Definitely looks like it's headin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:05
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit :
> > If there's anything I've missed, ple
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 11:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Page
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Trigger display bug
>
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> CREATE TRIGGER "tg_term_source_iu" BEFORE DELETEINSERT OR UPDATE ON
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:36
> To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] plpgsql_call_handler
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list.
> Sho
I've just updated and re-organised the pgAdmin To-Do list. It's checked into
CVS & updated on the website. If there's anything I've missed, please let me
know.
Regards, Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 10:20
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:13, Dave Page a écrit :
> > Fixed that (you forgot to reset the tag on txtPropertie
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 09:21
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pseudo modification of views
> and triggers ( again)
>
>
> Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 09:17, Dave Page a
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 February 2002 21:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Pseudo modification of views
> and triggers (again)
>
>
> > I've just found out that views can be renamed
19 matches
Mail list logo
