Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 31 March 2003 23:57 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools > > > Hi Dave and Keith, > > my sources are as of 2003-03-25 12:40. There are se

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread efesar
> Keith, are you happy to look at moving the QB onto Andreas' query form, > or does that create problems/worries? Dave, The Query Builder is based on an MDI Parent/Child structure. The parent is a frame, so I don't think it can be bound to any other windows. So that might be a problem. We might

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3: present and future

2003-04-01 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: This would *definately* be easier to implement in PostgreSQL . I'll post a message to the hackers list... Regards, Dave. Too late, already done (at least a 96% solution). Regards, Andreas, ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread efesar
> Uh, I hate MDI. You're using it at the moment to keep tables and views, > and MDI looks quite reasonable for this (actually, the first time MDI > looks good for me). I don't see how the sql input field should be > assembled into the existing query builder, unless the second notebook > page is us

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread Andreas Pflug
Hi Keith, efesar wrote: The only thing that is MDI is the table/view windows, and that should remain true. I dislike MDI as well, and I wanted to avoid it. However, it was the easiest way to do what was necessary. To build clipped frames in a similar manner seems like unnecessary effort. The reas

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3: present and future

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2003 00:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Lane; Keith > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3: present and future > > > *** Missing, currently I don't plan to implement (and no > tool, editing a > xrc f

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: efesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2003 00:05 > To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools > > > > > > 1. I just got time to try this build. There is a new bug > where if it > > > can't connect t

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: efesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 31 March 2003 23:39 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools > > > Dave, > > > 'scuse me!! What's wrong with pga2's output? It's multiline > - I take > > great care to format i

[pgadmin-hackers] FW: View definition formatting

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Page
Ooops, forgot to CC it. > -Original Message- > From: Dave Page > Sent: 01 April 2003 13:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: View definition formatting > > > Hi all, > > When using pg_get_viewdef(oid), the view definition is > returned in a reconstructed form (I assume) with all > f

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgadmin3 query tools

2003-04-01 Thread Andreas Pflug
efesar wrote: Dave, The Query Builder is based on an MDI Parent/Child structure. The parent is a frame, so I don't think it can be bound to any other windows. So that might be a problem. We might consider going the opposite way, and I can add the icons and functionality of the query tool to the Q