Re: [pgadmin-hackers] frmQueryBuilder.cpp.patch

2003-06-27 Thread Dave Page
Thanks, patch applied. Regards, Dave. > -Original Message- > From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 June 2003 19:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] frmQueryBuilder.cpp.patch > > > Here is a patch that fixes bug #2 in QB. I have, of course, >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 feedback

2003-06-27 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Dave Page wrote: From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the todo list public (so I don't duplicate requests)? Missed this bit - yes it is, it's here http://cvs.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pgadmin3/ Some more feature requests (currently running pgadmin3-20030626-Win32): - refresh

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 feedback

2003-06-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 June 2003 12:44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 feedback > > > Dave Page wrote: > >From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>Is the todo list public (s

[pgadmin-hackers] pga3: FreeBSD Port

2003-06-27 Thread Dave Page
Hi All, I just got KDE vaguely running on FreeBSD 5.1 and started working on a port of pga3. First problem, FreeBSD seems to evaluate: if test "$pgsql_cv_libpq" == "yes" -a "$pgsql_cv_libpqfe_h" == "yes" to false, even if both variables do actually equal yes. Please see attached logfile. As a

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pga3: FreeBSD Port

2003-06-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 June 2003 17:32 > To: Dave Page > Subject: Re: pga3: FreeBSD Port > > > Dave Page wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >First problem, FreeBSD seems to evaluate: > > > >if test "$pgsql_cv_libpq" == "yes" -a "$pgs

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build

2003-06-27 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5 for. Nope. The dialog metrics are vastly improved in 2.5, so gtk really looks the same as win32. Most strings won't fit in gtk if 2.4 if used, the fonts are really messed up. Still, I wonder about this versio

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build

2003-06-27 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 June 2003 21:45 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build > > > Dave Page wrote: > > > As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build

2003-06-27 Thread Andreas Pflug
Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 21:45 To: Dave Page Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build Dave Page wrote: As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support t