Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Hi Andreas.
setup0.h isn't contained though "wx-20031026.patch" of the accumulation.
you think that it was particularly excluded.
Write it in readme-patches.txt.
Hm, should be still in it, since -2.
Because I was stupid, I did Make-Test again.:-(
Does the thing which
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 October 2003 10:32
> To: Hiroshi Saito
> Cc: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
>
>
> Yes, probably, as soon as Dave finds the time to do so.
Go live has been surprisi
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 October 2003 10:32
To: Hiroshi Saito
Cc: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
Yes, probably, as soon as Dave finds the time to do so.
Go live has been su
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 October 2003 11:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
>
> Do you mean a wx cvs snapshot as of Oct. 26th? This isn't tested!
> The name of the new patch file
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 October 2003 11:16
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgadmin-hackers
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
Do you mean a wx cvs snapshot as of Oct. 26th? This isn't tested!
The name of the new patch fil
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 October 2003 12:04
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >
> >Probably a good thing because 20031026 doesn't work.
> >
>
> I'm not to
Dave Page wrote:
Although I now find that 20031010 hangs in the same way :-(
Probably because you're working as root ;-)
This might still be a cvs head, not a 20031010 snapshot. There's work
going on in the conversion section. For sure, it's a problem in the wx
startup code.
Regards,
Andrea
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 October 2003 12:59
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] New wx patch
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >Although I now find that 20031010 hangs in the same way :-(
> >
> >
>
> P
Hi Dave.
I search for the cause of this problem.
Is this helpful?
However, a problem is still left.:-(
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The bug in question is listed in BUGS.txt as: Menu item 'Query Browser'
> causes Segfault under unix - crash after qbForm->Show
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Hi Dave.
I search for the cause of this problem.
Is this helpful?
However, a problem is still left.:-(
Hm, I doubt that this is helpful in any way, because it just lets some
vars uninitialized before Create(), so I assume the current version is
better.
Regards,
Andrea
Hi Andreas.
From: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>
> >Hi Dave.
> >
> >I search for the cause of this problem.
> >Is this helpful?
> >However, a problem is still left.:-(
>
> Hm, I doubt that this is helpful in any way, because it just lets some
> vars uninitialize
Hello,
In the query window of current pgadmin3 CVS with wxGTK2ud v.
wxGTK2ud-2.5-20031010.5 on Red Hat Linux 9 (running GNOME; haven't tried
KDE):
Initially, a cursor is seen, but if focus is taken away from the window
(e.g. by using the mouse or ALT-TAB) and then returned, the cursor is
gone. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
