Dear Jean-Michel!
Your proposal description is very good but one point: not everybody knows what is
PostgreSQL. If we add "wellknown PostgreSQL database server" our description become
more complete and self-contained. Corrected standard description text then will be:
"pgAdmin is a free
soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've build FC1 rpms for pgadmin-1.0.2, wxwindows 2.5-20031010-7 and
uploaded them.
They are on ftp.PostgreSQL.org. They'll be at the nearest mirror after
sync.
Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
And here is pgadmin3 log file:
2003-11-26 19:25:37 INFO : Destroying a connect dialogue
2003-11-26 19:25:37 STATUS : Connecting to database...
2003-11-26 19:25:37 INFO : Creating pgConn object
2003-11-26 19:25:37 INFO : Server name: 192.169.0.254 (resolved
to: 192.169.
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2003 20:15
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] v1.0.2 Build
Hi all,
debian packages upload in progress :)
Thanks :-) BTW, I stripped out all the
Dear all,
here is a patch for pkg/debian tree in cvs:
- adds support for the .desktop file.
- adds entries that were done in 1.0.2 maintenance update to the
debian/changelog.
- corrects the wx build dependencies
I hope to produce another patch soon including the "one shot package"
which should
Hi Dave,
right before the first pgadmin3 release, we were discussing about how to
distribute the win32 version. You stated it should be a MSI package, and
claimed to do that. Apparently, you don't find the time, and I don't
have the tools to do it.
I've been creating a NSIS project (nsis.sourc
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2003 20:02
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Microsoft installer
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> right before the first pgadmin3 release, we were discussing
> about how to distribute the win32 ve
Sorry, maybe it's late, but which branch am I applying this to - 1.0.2 or 1.1.0?
Regards, Dave.
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 November 2003 16:23
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] debian package patch
>
> Dear all,
>
Dave Page wrote:
Sorry, maybe it's late, but which branch am I applying this to - 1.0.2 or 1.1.0?
Hi Dave,
sorry I didn't tell it.
It would be nice if you could apply them to both branches: 1.0.2 in case
we produce a 1.0.3 and 1.1.0 because that's what they were designed for.
Regards,
Raphaël
Dave Page wrote:
Huh? It is an MSI file. What did you think I've been distributing?
The project file is in pkg/win32.
I can see it in cvs, but there are only *.zip files under release/win32!
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1:
10 matches
Mail list logo