-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I saw that I haven't built the latest snapshot (20031212) for Fedora Core
1, and began building it.
I got an error.
+ make all
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering direct
> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 December 2003 08:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot
> of pgadmin3
>
>
> Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code?
Hi Dev
Hi all,
The cvs has now been moved. The new root is:
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/projects
The IP address has also changed but will take a liitle while to work
it's way around the DNS - it is now 80.176.1.156.
I have left the old repository in place for now but made it read only,
primarily to pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code?
> Hmm, odd. You could try running the bootstrap script.
Ok. I've edited the spec file to run bootstrap script. Package now
bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Latest snapshot (20031212) failed to build on FC1. I'm using the latest
wxwindows packages to buil them. Here is the error:
===
pgConn.o(.text+0x17e4): In function `pgConn::IsSSLconnected()':
db/pgConn.cpp:194: undefined referen
Hi devrim,
Message d'origine
>Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:20:26 +0200 (EET)
>De: Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sujet: [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Tha latest sna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The latest wxWindows packages were built for FC1 and uploaded to snake..
err... developer.pgadmin.org :)
http://developer.pgadmin.org/snapshots/wxwindows/FC1/20031010.9/
Tha latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should
up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raphaƫl,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >The latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should
> >upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight.
> Are you doing some dynamic linking ?
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :)
I keep an archive of all e-mails I get :-)
There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks...
Should I forward you my spam for archiving too? :->
Regards,
Andreas
---(en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks...
#df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 20161172 16482996 2654036 87% /home
/dev/sda2
OK, obviously these things are sent to try us :-)
The new server hosting the cvs and developer has developed what we can
only put down to a motherboard fault - basically;
- The system clock is running about twice as fast as it should, no
matter what I do with ntpd or adjtimex! Bizarrely though th
11 matches
Mail list logo