[pgadmin-hackers] beautifulsoup4, and Python 2.6

Hi, Per https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/ ,  beautifulsoup4 requires Python 2.7+, which is not available on RHEL 6, which includes PY 2.6. I don't intend to build PY 2.7 into RHEL 6 (*swh*) , so any recommendations here? If we cannot satisfy this requirement, should we keep

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin IV: Unittests-drop objects functionality

Hi Dave, Please find the patch for drop objects functionality for test framework. Now, test framework is able to drop all objects(like server, database, schema, etc.) which are created during test suite execution. Code included in the patch is only for server and database node. If everything

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server specific advanced config file for testsuite

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Navnath Gadakh wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Dave Page > wrote: >> >> BTW - I need the updated code that fixes all outstanding issues this >> week please. Release is coming up

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server specific advanced config file for testsuite

Hi On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Navnath Gadakh wrote: > Hi Dave, > As we know that, we are using two JSON files one is for basic > configuration of server(test_config.json) and second for detailed > configuration of server(test_advanced_config.json). >

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server specific advanced config file for testsuite

BTW - I need the updated code that fixes all outstanding issues this week please. Release is coming up fast... On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Navnath Gadakh > wrote: >> Hi

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PGAdmin 4 1.0-rc1 bugs

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michael Brown > wrote: > > Hey guys - I hope this is the right place to post bugs, if not yell at me > > (why aren't you guys using a bug tracker?) > > We are:

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PGAdmin 4 1.0-rc1 bugs

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Dave Page wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michael Brown >> wrote: >> > Hey guys - I hope this is the right

[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin 4 commit: Use SSL when loading Gravatar icons. Fixes #1694

Use SSL when loading Gravatar icons. Fixes #1694 Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin4.git;a=commitdiff;h=d848e9cefe1e25d2489809439ae731d6c1285b74 Modified Files -- web/pgadmin/browser/__init__.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM1674 - Reverse engineered SQL for functions with default values is incorrect

Hi *Patch with following changes:* 1) In SQL pane, the signature in comments had arguments with name and type, Now it will show arguments with type only. 2) There is no indent+newline between arguments (there isn't even a space). - Fixed 3) The default value for the last argument is omitted. -

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server specific advanced config file for testsuite

On 13 September 2016 at 14:18, Dave Page wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Navnath Gadakh > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > As we know that, we are using two JSON files one is for basic > > configuration of

[pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM1690 - Trailing spaces included in SELECT Script for functions

Hi Trailing spaces included in SELECT Script due to *Indentation issue*. Please find attached patch. Thanks, Surinder Kumar RM1690.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Server specific advanced config file for testsuite

Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Dave Page wrote: > BTW - I need the updated code that fixes all outstanding issues this > week please. Release is coming up fast... Yes. The enhanced test result is already completed, but before that drop objects functionality

[pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: To fix the issue on Table collection node refresh (pgAdmin4)

Hi, PFA patch to fix the issue where user tries to refresh on Table collection node it was throwing error. RM#1686 Issue: Nodes method was not implemented properly to handle such request in Table node. Also attaching a separate patch for typo in browser.js file due to which this error was

[pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: To fix the issue in Rules node (pgAdmin4)

Hi, PFA minor patch for rules node where it was throwing when user tries to create new rule. RM#1681 -- Regards, Murtuza Zabuawala EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company diff --git

[pgadmin-hackers] PATCH: To fix the issue of Table node (pgAdmin4)

Hi, PFA patch to fix the issue where code breaks when user tries to view data on table which do not have any column(s). RM#1677 -- Regards, Murtuza Zabuawala EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company diff --git a/web/pgadmin/tools/sqleditor/__init__.py

[pgadmin-hackers] PGAdmin 4 1.0-rc1 bugs

Hey guys - I hope this is the right place to post bugs, if not yell at me (why aren't you guys using a bug tracker?) Bug #1 - if a database is recreated in a different connection, pgAdmin will crash when trying to access the database. (pgAdmin3 also does this). Bug #2 - Table columns are sorted

Re: [pgadmin-hackers] PGAdmin 4 1.0-rc1 bugs

Hi On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michael Brown wrote: > Hey guys - I hope this is the right place to post bugs, if not yell at me > (why aren't you guys using a bug tracker?) We are: https://redmine.postgresql.org/projects/pgadmin4/issues > Bug #1 - if a database is