We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
9.4. to 42.x.x
We have two issues we are trying to address here.
1) we do not want to be tied to the server release schedule. This has been
somewhat addressed already but has left us with the second issue.
2) Avoid confusion as to which version
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
> 9.4. to 42.x.x
>
> We have two issues we are trying to address here.
>
> 1) we do not want to be tied to the server release schedule. This has been
> somewhat addressed already but has left
please ignore this. I fat fingered the email address.
Dave Cramer
On 27 November 2016 at 09:12, Dave Cramer wrote:
> We are proposing changing the JDBC version from
> 9.4. to 42.x.x
>
> We have two issues we are trying to address here.
>
> 1) we do not want to be tied to the server release
